The method of determining criteria based on consensus is used when the number of experts is more than 8 people, there is a significant number of criteria (from 6 to 15), and there is a large number of ranked data (about 10-20 elements).

The matrix method is used mainly when there is a strong relationship between the elements being ranked, and finding an element with greatest influence is critical for solving the problem.

The procedure for constructing the priority matrix for all three options is basically the same. The differences lie in determining the significance of the criteria.

The priority matrix is ​​built in the following order:

1. The main goal for the sake of which the priority matrix is ​​built is determined.

2. A team of experts is formed that will work on the task. Experts must understand the scope of the problem being solved and have an understanding of the methods teamwork(for example, about the brainstorming method, the Delphi method, etc.)

3. A list is compiled possible solutions the problem posed. The list can be compiled through the use of other quality tools, such as brainstorming, Ishikawa diagram, etc.

4. The composition of the criteria is determined. Initially, it can be quite large. The priority matrix will include only part of these criteria, because in the future it will be reduced by selecting the most important and significant ones.

To determine the composition of the criteria, you can use the following approaches:

• analyze the goal. This can be done using a tree diagram or an Ishikawa diagram;
• identify existing restrictions on achieving the goal (for example, financial or time restrictions);
• determine the benefits of achieving the goal;
• formulate the names of the criteria in such a way that they can be easily and objectively measured.

5. A weighting factor is assigned to each criterion. The weighting coefficient is assigned depending on the selected method.

For the analytical method:

• a rating scale is established for each criterion;
• For each numerical value of the scale, a definition of significance is given. In order to make the difference in weighting coefficients more noticeable, a scale with numerical values ​​1-3-9 is usually used, where 1 is low significance, 3 is medium significance, 9 is high significance).

For the consensus method:

• a certain number of points is established that experts must distribute between the criteria. The number of points should not be less number criteria;
• each expert distributes the assigned points between the criteria;
• The total number of points for each of the criteria is determined. This value will be the weighting coefficient of each criterion.

For the matrix method:

• the criteria are arranged in the form of an L - matrix;
• a scale is established for pairwise comparison of criteria (for example, “0” - criterion A is less significant than criterion B; “1” - criterion A and criterion B are equivalent; “2” - criterion A is more significant than criterion B);
• A pairwise comparison of all criteria is carried out.
• the weight coefficient of each criterion is determined (the weight coefficient is calculated as the sum of all values ​​in the matrix row).

6. The most significant criteria are selected. This can be done by discarding criteria with the smallest weight coefficients. If the number of criteria is not large, then all criteria can be saved for further work.

7. A method is established for calculating the significance of each of the decisions of the priority matrix (defined in step 3) based on the selected criteria (defined in step 6).

For this you can use the following options:

• a limited set of possible numerical values ​​with associated text is taken (similar to the analytical method specified in step 5);
• a voting system is used, as for the consensus method (step 5), when each expert has a limited number of points that can be distributed between decisions;
• negative numerical values ​​are used for negative relationships;
• a percentage scale is used instead of directly scoring each solution.

8. Each decision is evaluated against each criterion.

9. The score is multiplied by the weight coefficient of the corresponding criterion. The obtained values ​​are summed up for each of the decisions, which gives a final assessment of the priority of the decisions. The final score, which the priority matrix contains, can be left as is, or converted into percentages.

10. The resulting list of solutions is sorted in order of priority. If necessary, the priority of decisions can be presented in the form

Today we will look at how important it is correct placement priorities in any business, and how you can learn to arrange them using a simple technique with a complex name: Eisenhower matrix.

Surely each of us at least once faced a lack of time to complete all the planned tasks. Moreover, there is a certain category of people who lack it constantly and catastrophically! Trying to do everything in time, they even try, but this only makes the overall result suffer even more.

The main problem of such people is ignorance or unwillingness to use them in practice. In particular, one of the most important methods time management, which sounds like this: proper prioritization.

The success and timeliness of completing all existing tasks largely depends on the ability to correctly prioritize.

In other words, a person needs to correctly distribute the order of tasks and follow this order.

Exist different methods prioritization. Today I want to look at one of the most popular, and perhaps the most effective method, which was called the “Eisenhower Priority Matrix.” What it is and how to use it - more on that later.

The Eisenhower Matrix method of prioritization was invented not even by a mathematician or psychologist, but by the 34th President of the United States himself, Dwight David Eisenhower. Being a well-known politician, he, naturally, was constantly faced with the need to complete a huge number of things, and so, in order to keep up with everything, he developed this method for himself, which today is actively used in time management to complete both work and personal tasks.

The Eisenhower Matrix is ​​a coordinate system in which the X-axis represents the importance of the things that need to be done, and the Y-axis represents their urgency. Thus, four segments are formed, which differ in the degree of urgency and importance. Let's look at what the Eisenhower matrix looks like in the picture:

The Eisenhower Matrix prioritization method consists of distributing all available cases and tasks into these four segments to complete them in strict sequence.

If you distribute all tasks into these 4 segments, it turns out that:

– at the top – all urgent matters;

– on the right – all important matters;

– below – all non-urgent matters;

– on the left – all unimportant matters.

Now let’s briefly describe each of the resulting squares in the exact sequence in which you need to perform the tasks related to them.

1. Important and urgent matters. That is, the upper right segment of the Eisenhower matrix. The most important tasks should be located here, which, moreover, need to be completed urgently. What is called “a matter of life and death.”

This could include, for example, completing a job whose deadline is coming to an end, or an important business call if you promised to call at a certain time. Or, on a personal level, visit the dentist if you suddenly have a sharp toothache.

Ideally, no more than 1-2 cases should accumulate in this square. You should absolutely not “shove” everything into this segment: you must objectively assess how important and truly urgent this task is.

2. Not important, but urgent matters. Or the upper left segment of the Eisenhower matrix. This segment includes unplanned, suddenly appeared tasks that need to be completed urgently, but which are not particularly important. What is called “force majeure”.

For example, the boss asked me to go send mail. Or a heel fell off along the way, and you need to urgently repair it or return to change your shoes. Or you suddenly remembered that today is a colleague’s birthday, and the working day is already ending - you urgently need to congratulate him.

Some may mistakenly think that these matters fall into the first category, that is, they are important, but this is absolutely not the case. Because their implementation will not affect your future life or work results in any way - nothing will change at all from the fact that you do these things, however, they need to be done urgently, without this there is no way.

The second segment can often be empty: things in it, as a rule, appear suddenly and disappear immediately after they are urgently completed.

3. Important but not urgent matters. That is, the lower right segment of the Eisenhower priority matrix. This includes all tasks that are important to you, but do not require immediate completion. Important tasks, the deadline for which is not yet “pressing”, and which can wait if there are tasks in the first two segments.

For example, business contacts with clients that do not have a clear time frame, current work. On a personal level – playing sports, studying in English, reading useful literature.

It is important to understand that some tasks from this category, if not completed, gradually rise up and move into the first segment, that is, they become urgent. For example, you need to repay the loan by the 25th. If the 20th is on the calendar, it’s just an important matter, but if it’s the 24th, it’s already important and urgent.

This segment, although it is already the third in prioritization, plays a very important role great importance, since it is the solution of the problems included in it that has the maximum impact on a person’s future life activity.

4. Not important or urgent matters. The last, lower left square of the Eisenhower priority matrix. This includes cases on the implementation of which nothing at all depends, and which, according to by and large, often a person does not need them at all. They are united by one common term - “time wasters”.

For example, chatting with a friend on the phone, climbing social network, visit entertainment sites, etc.

You should start completing tasks from this category only if all other categories are this moment empty.

This is how the Eisenhower Matrix prioritization method works.

That's all. I hope you have taken note of these useful tips and recommendations. See you again on a site that will help you achieve success in any business and teach you how to competently manage your personal finances.

A priority matrix (criteria matrix) is a tool that can be used to rank the data and information obtained as a result in order of importance. brainstorming or matrix diagrams. Its application makes it possible to identify important data in situations where there are no objective criteria for determining their significance or when people involved in the decision-making process have different opinions regarding data priority.

The main purpose of a priority matrix is ​​to distribute different sets of elements in order of importance, as well as to establish the relative importance between elements through numerical values. The priority matrix can be constructed in three ways. Construction options depend on the method of determining the criteria by which the priority of data is assessed - the analytical method, the method of determining criteria based on consensus, and the matrix method.

The analytical method is used when the number of criteria is relatively small (no more than 6), it is necessary to obtain the full consent of all experts participating in the assessment, the number of experts does not exceed 8 people, large losses are possible in case of an error in prioritization.

The method of determining criteria based on consensus is used when the number of experts is more than 8 people, there is a significant number of criteria (from 6 to 15), and there is a large number of ranked data (about 10-20 elements).

The matrix method is mainly used when there is a strong relationship between the elements being ranked, and finding the element with the greatest influence is critical to solving the problem.

The procedure for constructing the priority matrix for all three options is basically the same. The differences lie in determining the significance of the criteria.

The priority matrix is ​​built in the following order:

• 1. The main goal for the sake of which the priority matrix is ​​built is determined.
• 2. A team of experts is formed that will work on the task. Experts must understand the area of ​​the problem being solved and have an understanding of teamwork methods (for example, brainstorming, the Delphi method, etc.)
• 3. A list of possible solutions to the problem posed is compiled. The list can be compiled through the use of other quality tools, such as brainstorming, Ishikawa diagram, etc.
• 4. The composition of the criteria is determined. Initially, it can be quite large. The priority matrix will include only part of these criteria, because in the future it will be reduced by selecting the most important and significant ones.

To determine the composition of the criteria, you can use the following approaches:

• - analyze the goal. This can be done using a tree diagram or an Ishikawa diagram;
• - identify existing restrictions on achieving the goal (for example, financial or time restrictions);
• - determine the benefits of achieving the goal;
• - formulate the names of the criteria in such a way that they can be easily and objectively measured.
• 5. A weighting factor is assigned to each criterion. The weighting coefficient is assigned depending on the selected method.

For the analytical method:

• - a rating scale is established for each criterion;
• - for each numerical value of the scale a definition of significance is given. In order to make the difference in weighting coefficients more noticeable, a scale with numerical values ​​1-3-9 is usually used, where 1 is low significance, 3 is medium significance, 9 is high significance).

For the consensus method:

• - a certain number of points is established that experts must distribute between the criteria. The number of points must be no less than the number of criteria;
• - each expert distributes the assigned points between the criteria;
• - the total number of points for each of the criteria is determined. This value will be the weighting coefficient of each criterion.

For the matrix method:

• - the criteria are arranged in the form of an L-matrix;
• - a scale is established for pairwise comparison of criteria (for example, “0” - criterion A is less significant than criterion B; “1” - criterion A and criterion B are equivalent; “2” - criterion A is more significant than criterion B);
• - a pairwise comparison of all criteria is carried out.
• - the weight coefficient of each criterion is determined (the weight coefficient is calculated as the sum of all values ​​in the matrix row).
• 6. The most significant criteria are selected. This can be done by discarding criteria with the smallest weight coefficients. If the number of criteria is not large, then all criteria can be saved for further work.
• 7. A method is established for calculating the significance of each of the decisions of the priority matrix (defined in step 3) based on the selected criteria (defined in step 6).

To do this, you can use the following options:

• - a limited set of possible numerical values ​​with interconnected text is taken (similar to the analytical method specified in step 5);
• - a voting system is used, as for the consensus method (step 5), when each expert has a limited number of points that can be distributed between decisions;
• - negative numerical values ​​are used for negative relationships;
• - a percentage scale is used instead of direct scoring for each solution.
• 8. Each decision is evaluated against each criterion.
• 9. The score is multiplied by the weight coefficient of the corresponding criterion. The obtained values ​​are summed up for each of the decisions, which gives a final assessment of the priority of the decisions. The final score, which the priority matrix contains, can be left as is, or converted into percentages.
• 10. The resulting list of solutions is sorted in order of priority. If necessary, the priority of decisions can be presented in the form of a Pareto chart.

• 1. We determine the purpose of compiling a priority matrix: to reduce the number of defects in the product.
• 2. Forming a team of experts: for example, the team of experts will consist of 3 people. Each of them is familiar with the method of developing solutions based on brainstorming.
• 3. We compile a list of possible solutions to the problem: a list of solutions to the problem posed, compiled by a team of experts.
• - change manufacturing technology;
• - increase the number of control points;
• - conduct training for craftsmen;
• - change the design of the product;
• 4. Determine the composition of the criteria: the composition of the criteria for assessing the priority of decisions.
• - no more than 100 person-hours are required to implement the solution
• - low cost of implementing the solution
• - the number of personnel involved is no more than 50 people.
• - reduction in waste costs by at least 1.5 times.
• 5. Assign a weighting coefficient for each criterion. Consider the purpose of the criteria for each of the 3 methods - analytical, consensus method and matrix method.

For the analytical method:

Table 1.

For the consensus method:

We establish that each expert can distribute 4 points between the criteria.

Table 2.

Table 3.

• 6. We determine the most significant criteria: because the number of criteria selected for the example is only 4, then we leave all the criteria.
• 7. Select a method for calculating the significance of each of the solutions proposed earlier (in step 3). To determine significance, we will use the scale "1" - "3" - "9", where 9 is the most significant decision, 3 is a significant decision, 1 is an insignificant decision.
• 8. We will assess the significance of each decision in relation to each criterion: to assess the significance of decisions we will use analytical method. The weighting coefficients of the criteria are determined in step 5.

Table 4.

9. We determine the priority of each solution: the score of each solution is multiplied by the weighting coefficient of each criterion and the values ​​are summed up.

Table 5.

• 10. We distribute solutions in order of priority:
• 1. Conduct training for masters - 118
• 2. Change manufacturing technology - 100
• 3. Increase the number of control points - 90
• 4. Change the design of the product - 72

The priority matrix, in comparison with other ranking methods, makes it possible to more objectively assess the significance of the data and establish the value of this significance.

At the same time, the disadvantage of this quality tool is also obvious - it is quite labor-intensive, especially when it is necessary to rank a large amount of data according to a large number of criteria.

You can easily get confused in the endless stream of everyday affairs, because every day there are more and more of them. Yesterday's unfinished tasks become today's, and what we did not have time to do today is automatically transferred to tomorrow. As a result, so many things can accumulate that you can’t figure out what has been done, what is in progress, and what is still waiting in the wings.

Such or detailed situations often occur among people who do not pay due attention to the process of planning their activities. Naturally, the skills of time management and time management are not taught at school, and many parents and other people who act as educators in the process of our development often themselves do not really know how to plan their activities, although this is not at all difficult. It’s just that due attention is not paid to this.

However, today there are many excellent planning techniques that allow you to learn how to rationally use your time resource and extract maximum benefit from this process for yourself. But in this article we will not consider all these techniques, but will give an example of only one, which is distinguished by its simplicity and effectiveness. This technique is called the "Eisenhower Matrix".

The Eisenhower Matrix is ​​one of the most popular time management tools that is used by many people around the world: from ordinary employees and middle managers to executives of large firms and world-famous corporations. The founder of this matrix is ​​the 34th President of the United States, Dwight David Eisenhower. As you might guess, this man was very busy and had to do many different things related to his activities. For this reason, he was optimizing his work schedule and list of tasks to perform. The result of his research was the matrix we are considering.

The meaning of the Eisenhower matrix is ​​mainly to learn how to competently distribute all your tasks, distinguish the important from the urgent, the non-urgent from the least important, and also reduce the time to the maximum for doing any tasks, the implementation of which does not produce any significant results. Let's talk about how all this works in practice.

The essence of the Eisenhower matrix
The Eisenhower Matrix consists of four quadrants, based on two axes - the importance axis (vertical) and the urgency axis (horizontal). As a result, it turns out that each quadrant differs in its quality indicators. All tasks and activities are recorded in each of the quadrants, thanks to which an extremely clear and objective picture is formed of what should be done first, what should be done second, and what should not be done at all. All this is quite simple, but giving a few explanations will not be superfluous in any case.

Quadrant A: important and urgent matters
In ideal planning, this quadrant of the matrix should remain empty, because the appearance of important and urgent matters is an indicator of disorganization and the possibility of blockage. This part of the schedule fills up for many people due to their inherent laziness and poor prioritization. Naturally, from time to time such things can appear in every person, but if this happens every day, then it’s time to pay attention to self-discipline.

So, the occurrence of cases in the A quadrant should be avoided. And to do this, you just need to complete the points of the remaining quadrants in a timely manner. But if there is something worth including in the first quadrant, it is:

Things that, if not completed, will have a negative impact on achieving your goals
Things that, if not done, can cause difficulties and troubles
Things related to health
It is also important to remember that there is such a thing as “delegation”. This means that when things appear in your A quadrant that can be delegated to someone else, you should definitely take advantage of this opportunity in order to resolve other important and urgent matters as quickly as possible.

Quadrant B: important but not urgent matters
The second quadrant deserves the most attention, because the matters located precisely in it are the most priority and promising, and it is these that should consist of the daily tasks of any person. It has been noticed that people who are primarily involved in the affairs of this quadrant achieve the greatest success in life, are promoted in their careers, and earn more money, have enough free time and live a happy and fulfilling life.

Please also note that the lack of urgency allows you to approach the solution of any problems more deliberately and constructively, and this in turn allows a person to reveal his full potential, independently think through all the nuances of his activities and manage the time frame of his affairs. But here, among other things, you need to remember that things that are in the B quadrant, if not done in a timely manner, can easily fall into the A quadrant, becoming even more important and requiring speedy completion.

Experienced specialists in time management, it is recommended to include in quadrant B all current affairs related to the main activity, planning and analysis of work, educational and sports activities, adherence to an optimal schedule and diet. Those. everything that ours consists of ordinary everyday life.

Quadrant C: urgent but not important matters
Things that are in this quadrant are, for the most part, distracting and do not bring a person any closer to the intended results. Often they simply interfere with concentration on the truly important tasks and reduce efficiency. The main thing when working with the matrix is ​​not to confuse urgent matters from quadrant C with urgent matters from quadrant A. Otherwise, confusion will form and what should be done first remains in the background. Always remember your goals and learn to distinguish the important from the unimportant.

Quadrant C matters include, for example, meetings or negotiations imposed by someone else, birthday celebrations of not very close people, sudden chores around the house, elimination of non-vitally important distractions that require attention (a vase broke, a microwave broke). stove, a light bulb has burned out, etc.), as well as all sorts of other things that do not move you forward, but only slow you down.

Quadrant D: Not urgent or important matters
Tasks in the last quadrant are of no benefit at all. In many cases, it is useful not only to deal with them in last resort, but also not to deal with them at all. Although you definitely need to know about them, because... They are the “time wasters”.

Another interesting feature of the tasks from this group is that they are very attractive to many people - these tasks are easy to do and bring pleasure, allowing you to relax and have a good time. Therefore, resisting the temptation to engage in them can be quite problematic. But it is absolutely necessary to do this.

In quadrant D you can write down such things as talking on the phone with friends about something unimportant, unnecessary correspondence or spending time on social networks, watching TV series and various “dumbing” TV shows, computer games and so on. Of course, every person should periodically relax and somehow entertain themselves, but there are more interesting and educational ways to do this: reading good books, intellectual games, visiting gyms and swimming pools, trips to nature, etc. If you can’t completely rid yourself of doing things from quadrant D or don’t want to, then you need to postpone their implementation at least until the moment when things from quadrants B and C are completed, and the time that will be devoted to things in quadrant D should be reduced to a minimum. The well-known proverb would be appropriate here: “It’s time for business, time for fun.”

As soon as you master the Eisenhower matrix and learn to competently distribute your affairs within it, you will notice that you have a lot of new free time, you manage to do everything in a timely manner and without haste, all your affairs are in order, goals are achieved one after another, and you yourself are almost always in good mood and cheerful mood. It's all about organization and composure. You yourself probably notice from time to time that disorganized people are always in a whirlwind of some incomprehensible affairs, they are always busy with something stupid, but “very important”, they look tired and irritated. Distinctive features many can be cited. But this is not important, but the fact that if you and I do not want to have similar results, then we must act differently. Namely: we must be organized, clearly understand what and when we need to do, and why we are doing all this. And the Eisenhower matrix is ​​perfect for this.

We wish you good luck and successful mastery of your new skill!

Do you have a whole mountain of things to do and are you tired of endlessly sorting through it?

Do you constantly have new tasks and don't know in what order to complete them?

You don't know exactly what things need to be done as soon as possible, and what can be put on the back burner?

Do you find it difficult to prioritize tasks in order to more effectively achieve your goals?

To solve such problems, many methods have been developed for organizing and prioritizing cases. All of them are distinguished by complexity, accuracy and clarity. To make their use more convenient, many different instruments: special diaries, computer programs, online organizers, mobile applications and so on.

One of the most popular methods is Eisenhower matrix or priority matrix. It was developed by US President Dwight Eisenhower to organize his affairs and carry them out more efficiently when he began to suffer from the problems described at the beginning of the article.

To apply this method, each case must be assessed according to two criteria: whether it is important or not and urgent or not. For visualization, a rectangular table (matrix) with 4 cells is used:

Important-Urgent: These are the most important things to do in the near future. Some people are happy about such things, so to speak, they mobilize a person and he does them faster. And for some, even a small number of such matters can create emotional tension and stress. Then a person may fall into a stupor, panic and put off such things, although he realizes that they need to be done as quickly as possible. But due to the rush to implement them, the quality of the results may be lower than expected. Therefore, it is better to strive to ensure that this area is empty. Such cases may appear due to erroneous planning, incorrect determination of the required resources for their implementation, lack of experience, inadequate assessment, force majeure, laziness, etc. When such cases appear, you need to immediately analyze them, determine the reasons why an important matter has become urgent, eliminate them and quickly implement such cases.

No matter - Urgent: these are things that for some reason have become urgent, but their implementation does not particularly affect the achievement of goals. Usually in this area there are “other people’s” things that you have to do, but not what you want to do. It is better to delegate such matters or refuse them, of course, if this does not lead to negative consequences(fines, punishments, etc.). A large number of cases in this area may indicate that a person is highly dependent on someone who sets tasks for him and uses him as a resource. This means that a person cannot fully engage in his own affairs, which means he is not getting closer to his personal goals. In this case, you need to become freer, determine who is imposing goals, get rid of the relationship with him or make it mutually beneficial. Therefore, it is also better to make this area empty.

Important - Not urgent: these are the most important things that do not have a deadline or it is still quite long. These tasks should be completed immediately after all urgent tasks are completed. Having the majority of things to do in this area indicates effective planning, prioritization and management of your life. Such tasks are completed smoothly, comfortably (but not slowly), and the quality of the results usually exceeds expectations. Therefore, these things have the best impact on achieving your goals, so you should try to ensure that the majority of things are in this area.

Not important - Not urgent: these are the most useless things that should not be done or can be done in free time, for example, for relaxation, entertainment. Such cases, as a rule, appear due to insufficient planning or incorrect goal setting. If it is impossible to refuse such things, then it is better to replace them with similar ones, but more important matters, which will end up in the “Important-Not Urgent” area. For example, instead of “play a game,” you can do “practice a skill” or “play a sport.” Also try to keep this area empty.

Thus, according to this method, the most useful area is " Important - Not urgent" Therefore, you need to plan things so that most of them end up in this area (but this needs to be done adequately, and not in such a way that they placed the matter here, but in fact it should have been completed yesterday). Then achieving your goals will be most successful, effective and comfortable.

Use the following to determine the order in which things should be done: rule: do the most important and urgent things first, then the urgent unimportant ones, then the important non-urgent ones. And non-urgent, unimportant tasks may not be worth doing at all.

To make the method even more accurate, you can use not 4 areas, but scales " Importance" And " Urgency"with values ​​from 0 to 10. Then each case must be subjectively assessed: how important it is on a scale from 0 to 10, and how urgent it is also on a scale from 0 to 10. Then the case is located in a cell of the matrix at the intersection of the assigned values. Similar to the original version of the method, the area of ​​important and non-urgent matters is considered the best, i.e. with importance 5-10 and urgency 0-5.

For convenient use This method has created a special section - Important-Urgent.

It automatically arranges cases based on their Urgency and Importance parameters, which are set in the case details panel on the Motivation tab. The service supports both versions of the method: both in the form of 4 areas (2x2 mode) and in the form of 2 scales (10x10 mode). You can view tasks in the appropriate cells, move them to other cells for more precise planning, and decide in what order to complete them.

After distributing all the cases according to such a matrix of priorities, a general, clear picture will appear of which cases are the most important and urgent. Based on this matrix, you can easily determine which things are the highest priority and are best implemented first.

As a result, with the help of the Eisenhower matrix, you will forever get rid of the “mountain” of tasks, you will be able to quickly prioritize new tasks (place them in desired area), you will easily determine the order of doing things, which in general will help you achieve any goals more efficiently and successfully.

We hope you will like this method and will help you quickly realize your cherished dreams and make your life even happier.

Write your opinion about this below, it is very important to us!

And tell your friends about the article. Perhaps it will be useful to them.

Sincerely, Team of the project "Personal development and self-realization"

Head: Sergey Marchenko. Creator of "SiRiOS" and website, practical psychologist, self-realization trainer, life coach, consultant, systems engineer