Shocking document! A secret international memorandum effective May 1, 2016.

In Strasbourg, on June 25-29, 2014, a secret International Memorandum “ΥΠΕΡΜΝΗΜΟΝΙΟ - MEMORANDUM” was signed, which comes into force on May 1, 2016. The full text of this Memorandum, translated from English into Greek, was posted on August 14, 2014 and re-published on September 6, 2014 on the Internet portal http://apokalypsisnow.blogspot.ru/2015/04/blog-post.html and is accompanied by an article -comment “ΣΟΚ! ΔΙΑΒΑΣΤΕ, ΔΕΝ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΣΕΝΑΡΙΟ ΤΡΟΜΟΥ! Η ΣΥΜΦΩΝΙΑ ΤΟΥ ΟΛΟΚΛΗΡΩΤΙΚΟΥ ΣΚΟΤΟΥΣ ", that is," Shock! Read, this is not a terrorism scenario! Consent of all the forces of evil. "

The Memorandum - ΥΠΕΡΜΝΗΜΟΝΙΟ-MEMORANDUM directly concerns the Cooperation in the field of politics, governance and religion between the European Union - the Greek Government, the Church of Constantinople “to me Istanbul”, the Christian Orthodox Churches, the Catholic Church, the Russian Government and the Government of the Republic of Cyprus.

The essence of this Memorandum boils down to the establishment of a NEW PLANETARY RELIGION - MUDANA RELIGIO ADUNATA with a new type of society, culture, morality, education, medical care, or rather, a project for a complete reorganization of the Church and society, the creation of the Anti-Church and society - the state of Antichrist. This Document reveals the reasons for the current events in Greece, Russia, proves indisputably the connection into a kind of single and strong knot - electronic identification, homosexuality, new morality, education and religious reforms. In the light of this document, the transformations in the field of spiritual education become clear, as well as the reasons for such a hasty convocation in Constantinople in 2016 on the day of Holy Pentecost of the Pan-Orthodox Council. The goal is one - to destroy the Orthodox Church, to turn people into cattle.

Prominent hierarchs who signed this Memorandum, among them are the signatures of such true pastors of the Church of Christ as Archimandrite. Ephraim, Metropolitan Neophyte of Morph, who is a disciple of the holy elder Paisius the Holy Mountain, as well as Metropolitan Timothy of Vostra, then they showed their complete disbelief in God in the Trinity of the glorified and worshiped, renounced the True God with their signatures and prepared themselves eternal hellish torments. However, and we emphasize this, we do not doubt that this document is nevertheless a real “action plan” for the Masonic forces, in many respects explaining the reforms already under way in our society.

It was signed by:

A. President of the European Parliament HERMAN VAN ROBEY

B. Representative of the Government of Greece Minister of Education

ANDREAS LOVERDOS

C. Representative of the Church of Constantinople, outside Constantinople, Metropolitan of Iconian THEOCLITOS, Asia Minor

G. Representative of the Slavic Patriarchates and the Russian Government, Archbishop Hilarion of Volokolamsky, Russia

D. Representative of Holy Mount Athos, abbot EFREM VATOPEDSKY

E. Representative of the Cyprus Church and the Government of Cyprus, Metropolitan Neophyte of Morph and of Trimyphus VARNAVA,

G. Representative of the Church of Antioch, Elijah of Tripoli,

I. Representative of the Alexandrian Church, VASILY Trypilsky,

Vladimir Osipov

25.01.2016 - 22:54

A secret international Memorandum signed in Strasbourg on June 25-29, 2014, which comes into force on May 1, 2016, has been present on the Internet for 3 months already, i.e. simultaneously with the convocation on the initiative of Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople, the so-called. "Pan-Orthodox Conference" in Istanbul.
The memorandum is shocking. It deals with the establishment of a new planetary religion, which is in fact the goal of the aforementioned ecumenical meeting in Istanbul. Radical reforms of the Church and society are outlined:
- reform of church worship, incl. cancellation of matins;
- removal of icons from the church, removal of iconostases;
- cancellation of the obligatory wearing of the clothes of clergy outside the church;
- removal of saints - "anti-Semites";
- removal of "anti-Semitic" chants from all Christ. churches;
- the introduction of a holiday for the Jewish Holocaust for all Christian churches;
- removal of all national holidays for all Christian Churches;
- the introduction of new poly-religious services with musical instruments for all Christian churches;
- organization of anti-racist and anti-fascist concerts inside and outside the church;
- the abolition of the ban on entry to Holy Mount Athos and the transformation of Athos into an ecological archaic-Byzantine hostel-state, turning it into a new center of a new (i.e. ecumenical - St. Petersburg) Christian trend;
- taking the first role in the Christian church of the Vatican;
- the liquidation of all patriarchies, except for the Russian, Roman and Constantinople;
- entry into the UN of a single Christian church;
- the care of the Greek Church for the maintenance of Muslim, Buddhist prayer houses and, in general, all religious beliefs from its own funds and the European Union;
- issuance of an Electronic Card to all persons insured in the Unified Electronic System within 365 days;
- cancellation of religious and national holidays in all educational institutions;
- elimination of churchliness of pupils;
- Mandatory visit to the synagogue and Islamic mosque (it is not specified only whether it is necessary to visit mosques under the control of ISIS and other Islamist organizations - SPB);
- the practical implementation of a sex education course at all levels of school education;
- introduction of slide images in a sex education lesson;
- recognition of sexual freedom on television and in the press and the free distribution of pornographic magazines;
- legalization of homosexuality in educational institutions, teaching homosexuality;
- entrance to hospitals only with an insurance card, otherwise the entrance will be prohibited;
- electronic identification of all citizens of the European Union and the Russian state;
- legalization of all immigrants in all EU countries;
- removal of the Greek flag and flags of all of Europe, the abolition of religious holidays in Europe;
- recognition of homosexual and transsexual marriages;
- the creation of monasteries with monks and nuns of all confessions and religions in the European Union and on the Holy Mountain;
- the adoption of civil partnership and gays and the elimination of compulsory religious and civil marriages for the entire European Union;
- the abolition of the obligatory baptism of young children and metrich. books;
- removal of religious burials in the EU and the gradual introduction of compulsory incineration - cremation of the dead;
- the cancellation of national holidays and the recognition of the world government - from December 10, 2016;
- the adoption by Christian churches of the abolition of national states. Cancellation of state sovereignty.

The Memorandum comes into force on May 1, 2016 and until August 16, 2020. The document ends with the words: “We pray again and again to one God and one man, so that He appears in the world to solve all the problems of the planet.” It is impossible to imagine that God would approve of homosexuality, the actual elimination of Christianity, the elimination of churchliness of disciples, the notorious sexual education and other abominations listed in the Memorandum. Obviously, the authors of the Memorandum do not mean God, but a different person. As far as the cult of the "one man" is concerned, this is probably the Antichrist. So this is the memorandum of the antichrist.

The document has 12 signatures. It is highly doubtful that the Memorandum of Antichrist would be signed by the representative of Athos, Archimandrite Ephraim and Metropolitan Neophytos of Morph (Cyprus) named under the document. As for the President of the European Parliament Herman van Robei, the representative of the Church of Constantinople, Metropolitan Theoklitos, these persons could sign the ominous text, because its content largely corresponds to the position of the European Parliament and the heretical Patriarchate of Constantinople, which has been permeated with the Masonic spirit since the 1920s. Article 15 of the Masonic Memorandum states: "The above agreements will be ratified by the Ecumenical Council of the Christian Orthodox Church from June 19, 2016 to July 9, 2016" - this year.

Among the signatories of the Memorandum there is also the signature of the representative of the Slavic Patriarchs and the Russian Government, Archbishop (in fact - Metropolitan - St. Petersburg) of Volokolamsk Hilarion. Although Vladyka Hilarion is actively seeking a meeting between Patriarch Kirill and the heretic-pontiff and advocates joint services with heretics, we still doubt that he could have put his signature on the anti-Christian and anti-Russian document. It seems that His Holiness Patriarch of Moscow and All Russia would not allow him to do this. And it is unlikely that the head of the Government of the Russian Federation D.A. Medvedev gave Hilarion such a sanction.

And although a number of signatures on the secret Memorandum are clearly falsified, we still do not consider it to be an absolute fake. Obviously, a group of Freemasons fabricated this document for the future, firstly, it largely corresponds to the general line of the EU member states and the United States (elimination of the family, the binary code of humanity, "velvet" discrimination against Christianity, imposition of homosexuality and other perversions, deliberate damage to children and schoolchildren by the so-called sexual education, etc.), and, secondly, the Memorandum serves as a pusher for the Masons and the Vatican, as it were, a lever for pushing through ecumenism and the actual elimination of Holy Orthodoxy, initiated by the Pope and the Patriarch Bartholomew on the so-called. "Pan-Orthodox Conference" in Istanbul or Chambesy (Switzerland) in May-June 2016

We once again appeal to His Holiness Patriarch Kirill with a request to refrain from participating in the so-called. "Pan-Orthodox Conference" 2016 Russian Orthodoxy is the last rock that casts waves of wickedness and apostasy on the planet. Amen.

Union of Orthodox Brotherhoods
SPB Co-Chairman Vladimir Osipov
Moscow. January 24, 2016

From the editor. The statement, which came to the editorial office signed by the famous Orthodox figure Vladimir Osipov, comments on the highly controversial so-called. "Memorandum" walking the global network. Even the UPB co-chairman himself notes that a number of its provisions are falsified. Of course, it cannot be ruled out that this "document" ("Memorandum") as a whole is a forgery, as well as the signatures of the hierarchs under it.

However, Vladimir Osipov's alarming letter raises by no means narrow questions of the Memorandum's authenticity. All points on dehumanization and de-Christianization, first of all, of Europe are being actively implemented. A few days ago, it became known about the ban on the baptism of babies in a number of EU countries. Legalization of same-sex marriages and the total imposition of sodomy in the EU is not even worth talking about - this is commonplace, as well as the fact that even Orthodox Greece broke down, which, under the leadership of the atheist Tsipras, in addition to the crisis, also received the legalization of "partnerships" of sodomites.

Against this background, information continues to flow about the preparation of a pan-Orthodox "council" or "conference", which cannot but cause alarm among believers. Unfortunately, the Patriarchate does not pay enough attention to explaining what is happening among the flock, which gives the impression of a latent preparation of global forums out of sight of all members of the Russian Orthodox Church. Sharing the alarm of the SPB letter, the editorial board of Segodnya.ru confirms the unacceptability of the destructive path of decay that is being imposed on Russia by the so-called "partners".

In addition, we emphasize the importance of openness and publicity in preparing the participation or non-participation of the pastors of the Russian Orthodox Church in joint events with the Vatican and the Patriarchate of Constantinople. It is precisely the clarity and clear-cut vowel position that does not allow for discrepancies and behind-the-scenes minutes-memoranda that distinguishes the Catholic and Apostolic Church from other branches that have struggled on the path of apostasy and heresy.

On the same day:

New Ecumenical Council may become an attempt to "raider seizure" of the Russian Church

In May 2016, apparently, an event will take place, by and large, grandiose - the Pan-Orthodox Council of representatives of almost all Orthodox churches in the world. One of the statements of the last preparatory inter-Orthodox conference says that this will happen "if unforeseen circumstances do not prevent it." Circumstances developed in such a way that for 1000 years, while states were destroyed and created, wars raged, revolutions raged, Christians tried to convene the next Ecumenical Council, but something always got in the way.

It's no joke, even Stalin failed to gather Orthodox Christians to the Ecumenical Council at one time, under which the USSR was actively involved in this issue, wishing to give the Russian Patriarch the status of Ecumenical. And now even the pre-war preparations of Turkey and Russia did not interfere with the Council. By a common decision, due to the deterioration of relations between Russia and Turkey, it was moved from Istanbul to Crete, which is also located on the territory of the Ecumenical Church of Constantinople. Patriarch Kirill has already managed to discuss the issue of the Council with Vladimir Putin and get approval. All this makes it clear that the mood for the event is more than serious. If they wanted to find a reason to cancel the Cathedral, it would not be difficult.

The Ecumenical Council is the highest governing body of the Church. However, the intricacies of the canons suggest that the event itself receives the status of the universal event only after the fact, after some time, after its holding, if the majority of the participants, in one way or another, recognize its decisions. It is not surprising that even now menacing rhetoric swirls around the Cathedral and the most terrible speeches are made. Many believers around the world, not only in Russia, are convinced that the Council is called to be "modernist", "liberal" and "Masonic".

! It is assumed that the Cathedral will become the arena of the struggle between Moscow and Constantinople / Istanbul, where the latter personifies globalism, the world oligarchy and the management of the Church from Washington. The hierarchs on it will allegedly finally approve the path to the creation of the so-called "Euro-Orthodox" or "syncretic Orthodoxy", turning the religious tradition into folklore. The hierarchy and bishops are trying to explain that, one way or another, they need to get together and discuss the problems that have accumulated over the centuries, but nothing global will happen. But if important questions are not raised, why then hold a Council at all, the believers ask themselves.

Hence the main question, whether this Council is Ecumenical, or rather whether it will claim this title. In the Russian tradition, there are ideas based on the prophecies attributed to various holy prophecies that the VIII Ecumenical Council will become "robber", "wolf", since the Orthodox Church will finally give up its positions and go to unite with heretics, so it will become a clear sign of the end times.

However, Orthodox theologians have been working hard for two years to calm the flock. For example, it is argued that the VIII Ecumenical Council was long ago, it was simply not noticed or forgotten. According to one version, the VIII Ecumenical Council took place at the end of the 11th century, but it was not recognized by the legates of Rome who participated and condemned there, which was not yet considered heretical. According to another version, the VIII Ecumenical Council was the Ferraro-Florentine Council, where already Orthodox representatives were forced to sign a partial union, but then they also refused to recognize it, under pressure from believers. However, without looking back at the historical events, the Russian Orthodox Church still avoids calling the forthcoming Council Ecumenical, preferring the name Pan-Orthodox. Constantinople / Istanbul, however, being the Ecumenical Church, is not shy about this name.

“Whether this event is an Ecumenical, apostasy,“ wolf ”Council, which the Church Fathers spoke about, is a difficult question. the number of bishops who were not elected in the Church, but were appointed representatives through bureaucratic procedures. The laity are not represented at this Council. This already tells us about the uncanonicity of the forthcoming Council. But on the other hand, if the Council is "wolfish", if it is "apostatic ", then it should be non-canonical, how else? The question turns out to be complicated, and it should be answered by visionaries, and not such sinners as me. I do not dare to judge things of this kind, for the question of the 8th Ecumenical Council, the renounced Council is a question eschatology, the science of the end times. This question, as it was predicted, will be resolved in the last times and will be an absolutely indisputable sign of the arrival of the Antichrist in the world ",- comments On the eve.RUAndrey Fefelov, editor of the Internet TV channel Day-TV.

However, in addition to the vivid problem of apocalyptic phobias, there are more earthly problems around the convocation of a Pan-Orthodox Council. The eschatological veil around him only sharpens them. Another attempt to convene a Council is only officially more than 50 years old. Several dozen pre-council conferences took place during this time. The very idea to try again to assemble a new Ecumenical Council has been wandering around the Orthodox world since 1860. This attempt is lobbied by the Ecumenical Patriarchate in Constantinople.

! The Patriarchate of Constantinople, and now in fact the Istanbul Patriarchate, is an object of intra-church anecdotes, since in Istanbul itself, the current Patriarch Bartholomew can gather a little more than 3,000 believers. However, according to the so-called "right of honor", Bartholomew is among the patriarchs first among equals, and it is generally accepted that he also enjoys active support from the United States.

It is not surprising that, according to the general opinion of observers from Russia, Constantinople has its own specific plan associated with the new Ecumenical Council: to reorganize the now very free and not very obligatory communion of Orthodox local churches into something more centralized and controlled. Actually, unity is the main goal of the Council declared to the public. Only now this idea is understood in different ways.

"Historical experience has shown that autocephalous Churches often behave as self-sufficient Churches, as if saying to the rest of the Churches:" I don't need you. "<...>All of this reveals the need for some kind of [regulatory] body, established officially or unofficially, which would solve all the differences and problems that arise in order to avoid divisions and strife ", - spoken by Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople in his speech in March 2014.

Such a body, in his opinion, could be just such a Council. "One gets the impression that Orthodoxy is a multitude of Churches, but not one Church." The current Ecumenical Patriarch believes that such a body is the Institute of Pan-Orthodox Conferences established more than 50 years ago by the Ecumenical Patriarch Athenagoras.

! According to the protesters against participation in the Council of the Russian Orthodox Church, Bartholomew's plan is simple: by creating a supranational structure with the help of the Council (for example, Pan-Orthodox conferences, the decisions of which will be binding), begin to exercise control over all Orthodox Churches in the world. Moreover, at this stage, as the protesters say, it makes no difference what decisions this Council will take. It is only important that by the fact of its existence it somehow legitimizes such a body.

In fact, the claims of the throne of Constantinople have long been one of the key problems of the Pan-Orthodox Council. Even 50 years ago, in such proposals, most observers from Russia saw a "roll-over" on the position of the Russian Orthodox Church. The Russian Church, like some other local Churches, insists on preserving the order that has been established for 2000 years, recalling the traditions of conciliarity that were laid down in early Christian times.

! It should be noted that the Ecumenical Patriarchate has long ceased to enjoy trust in Russia, and not only in Russia; the Greek Church, in whose jurisdiction the most influential Athonite monasteries in the Orthodox world, as well as the Georgian Church, have refused to participate in the Pan-Orthodox Council. The Orthodox community around the world with might and main accuses the Patriarchate of Constantinople of having links with the CIA, most of its flock are American Greeks, and in its claims it sees an attempt to abolish the influence of the ROC on the Orthodox. To put it mildly, the Catholicophilia of the current Patriarch of Constantinople is also perplexing.

"The Patriarch of Constantinople is now behaving very surprisingly - he is completely ready to unite with Rome! It turns out, from his point of view, there are no questions, except one: will the Pope be the head of the church?" - commented two years ago on the dialogue about the Pan-Orthodox Council Alexey Osipov, professor of the Moscow Theological Academy.

! This is another problem of the Council. On the one hand, believers openly express their distrust of Constantinople, on the other hand, there is no trust in some of their own representatives. So, of particular concern is the figure Metropolitan Hilarion, which is famous in church circles for its Catholicophilia.

In the endless Pan-Orthodox conferences, the Orthodox community discerned open hints that the surrender of positions in the doctrine itself was approaching. This is, first of all, about ecumenism, the movement for the unification of Christian confessions, which originated in the 30s. XX century (at the origins, by the way, were the passengers of the "philosophical steamer" Fr. Bulgakov and Berdyaev).

! For a long time, in its various versions, the ecumenical movement, which reached the most diverse insanities, from joint prayers with shamans, to general divine services with the performance of the sacraments of the Church, remained marginal in the West, something like the research of leftist philologists who tried to synthesize global languages ​​such as Esperanto. In part, this was also due to the fact that such actions were approved by the allies of the USSR in the left movement of the West and were anti-globalization. However, with the collapse of the USSR, the situation suddenly changed and from the marginal environment ecumenist ideas seeped into the highest offices and suddenly became the weapon of globalists.

Since then, Orthodox forums have been filled with photographs of Orthodox hierarchs at joint events with Catholics, Protestants or even Jews, invariably provoking the anger of their participants. Above all this, the ghost of Freemasonry and the invisible hand of the world's elites flies, it is not surprising that some of the believers are sure that the spirit of ecumenism has long settled in Moscow cells and high offices.

There is something to be afraid of. For example, two years ago in Moscow, in the Memorial Synagogue on Poklonnaya Gora, an interfaith Easter marathon was held with the aim of mutual understanding and cooperation between representatives of traditional religions. Everything took place with the support of the Moscow government. Festive concerts were held during Holy Week.

“For example, here is Hieromonk Dimitri, a member of the missionary commission under the Moscow government, speaking at an interreligious Easter event held with the support of the Moscow government, he spoke about the Orthodox understanding of Easter. This is wonderful! Apparently, there is, it turns out, some Orthodox understanding of Easter, but there is a Jewish one. There is, however, such a trifle as the Resurrection of Christ, in which the Jews do not believe, but it seems to have been overcome, "commented then an Orthodox writer, editor-in-chief of the information-analytical portal about religion" AMIN.SU "Vladimir Semenko.

In the promulgated agenda of the Council, formed as a result of 50 years of struggle, questions about interreligious communication occupy a fairly large part. However, many "ecumenical", liberal issues of the Russian Church have been knocked out of the agenda. In November 2015, the Russian Church refused to sign the so-called "document on perverts" - a draft regulation on the contribution of the Orthodox Church to the elimination of racial and other discrimination, which was being prepared for the Council. Also, questions about changing the calendar were turned off, the question of marriage and the reduction and facilitation of fasting, and the invasion of the priesthood - everything that Constantinople lobbied - was "neutralized". The Russian Patriarchate presents this as an unconditional diplomatic victory.

According to historian of religion and former member of the Interreligious Council of Russia Roman Silantyev, reproaches to the Department of External Relations of the Russian Orthodox Church, which, in fact, is responsible for the communication of the Russian Church with other confessions, are in vain. There is simply no greater opponent of ecumenism than the OVCC in the country, says Silantyev.

“In fact, I myself have worked for several years and for a fairly long period of time in the Department of External Church Relations and traveled to various interfaith conferences, including the General Assembly of the World Council of Churches. We constantly heard various proposals about common prayer and the like. Of course, this did not meet with any approval. I do not remember going to any joint prayers. Rather, such practices were openly mocked, "- he noted.

According to the journalist MaKsima Shevchenko, the theme of ecumenism simply cannot appear at the Council, no matter how anyone wants it, since it was long ago closed by patristic teachings.

“Ecumenism? I am with them in one prayer, although many times in Italy and Switzerland they offered me communion. I said: “I cannot, because it will be a lie.” As well as being near my Muslim friends, I also prayed, but with them, it is true , there is no liturgy, therefore there are no questions here ", - commented On the eve.RU Shevchenko.

However, the grandiose Cathedral itself, in his opinion, assembled for the first time in several centuries for an inappropriate reason, will look strange.

"The reason for convening the Ecumenical Councils was the study of a certain heresy. Roughly speaking, all Councils supplemented the Creed, each Council put an end to the most important theological discussion. What is the current conceptual reason for convening such a Council? Decisions on autonomy and autocephaly can be made at the level of patriarchs, Ecumenical Councils As for the Ukrainian Churches, the convocation of an Ecumenical Council is not required for their condemnation, because these Churches are already schismatic, since they are not recognized by any Orthodox Church in the world, except for the Ukrainian Autocephalous Church, part of which comes from the Ukrainian Autocephalous Church , which until 1939 was on the territory of Poland, then divided between Germany and the USSR.The conflict is that formally the churches on the territory of Galicia and Volhynia have a canonical origin and in partial communion were recognized by Constantinople. But, of course, Filaret arranged there in fact an absolute independence and a schismatic organization. A Council is not needed to condemn her. Then why is this Cathedral needed? Just to declare that we are for world peace, to express our attitude towards America? Isn't it too small for an Ecumenical Council? The church will endure forever, but kings come and go ", - says Shevchenko.

“I just don't see any reason now for convening an Ecumenical Council. But in order to reassure the believers, we must recall that Patriarch Kirill is an Orthodox patriarch, and, of course, he will not sign anything seditious. us when one patriarch signed something in Europe and, returning to Moscow, was simply expelled by Muscovites. Muscovites simply did not let him into the city after the signing of the union. I am sure that our Orthodox patriarch will not agree to this, but if something happens, we will act in accordance with the statutes and principles of the Orthodox faith, for God is betrayed by silence "- he continues.

! However, believers do not even think to calm down. They are sure that it is not the Council itself that is dangerous, but the fact of its holding. For the last two years, when it became clear that the preparations for the Pan-Orthodox Council had reached the final stage, protests took place throughout the country, appeals to the Patriarch and the hierarchy were poured in.

“Every day we receive two or three letters from Orthodox believers from different parts of our homeland, containing an appeal“ not to go to the Eighth Ecumenical Council, not to go to the Antichrist Cathedral, ”Metropolitan Hilarion, head of the Department for External Church Relations, complained to the press. According to him, 43 such letters were received one day.

Under pressure from the Orthodox community, the Russian Church, in turn, persuaded Constantinople to publish the documents of the forthcoming Council. However, this did not calm the protesters. If we summarize their position in some general opinion, the patriots from the Church hoped that in connection with the Ukrainian policy (in this environment, the patriarch was even credited with the authorship of the term "Russian World") and Putin's support in the elections, the development of an ideology for the country within the Church would begin. However, this never happened, and the blame for the change of course is laid on Illarion, who, one by one from conspiracy theories, on the eve of the second Maidan, he once again visited Poland and took part in another event for rapprochement with Catholics. This visit is associated with the DECR's silence regarding the second Maidan, where, by the way, Ukrainian schismatics were in charge. The protesters also believe that the theme of the Ecumenical Council was finally put on the agenda with the indirect support of the former President of Ukraine Yushchenko, who, while still in office, tried to make his brother monk the head of the autocephalous Orthodox Church of Ukraine. But then autocephaly was not proclaimed by Constantinople, and supposedly the Ecumenical Council became a concession to the Istanbul Patriarch from the Russian Church for this. Only now they had to go to it contrary to the position of a large number of Orthodox Christians.

Whether it is true or not, it can be noted that the Russian Church could not escape the influences of the spirit of the world. The main problematic of the situation around the Ecumenical Council clearly resembles the political situation in the country as a whole. The sympathies of a part of the church leadership not only for co-religionists abroad, but for the Vatican, for the ecumenical movement, for the West as a whole, are too noticeable and too conspicuous to be carefully hidden. It is expected that the statements and actions of Metropolitan Hilarion and his associates irritate the conservative and patriotic part of the Orthodox, who nevertheless feel in the position of a dog barking at a caravan. However, the Russian Orthodox Church has long been much older than any form of Russian statehood, has thousands of years of experience in overcoming crisis situations, continuing to be itself and preserving the basic principles of its existence. Maybe, if the Church was unable to give birth to an ideological project for the country in its depths, it will at least be able to give a recipe for overcoming the crisis to the modern political system?

His Holiness Patriarch Kirill: I expect from the Council an even greater consolidation of the Orthodox world

On January 27, 2016, at the end of his stay in Chambesy (Switzerland), His Holiness Patriarch Kirill of Moscow and All Russia answered questions from journalists.

According to His Holiness, the main result of the meeting of the Primates and representatives of the Local Orthodox Churches in Switzerland is that all the documents agreed during the meeting to be discussed at the Pan-Orthodox Council "will be published in the very near future."

“Our Church insisted that there was no embargo on these documents, so that everyone could familiarize themselves with them, because the critical attitude of many towards the upcoming Council was formed precisely because of the information vacuum,” His Holiness emphasized. “And, probably, the most important thing is that everyone will know what issues and how will be resolved at the Council, what documents will form the basis of the Council's decisions.”

“If we talk about the content, then, of course, it is very important that calendar issue removed from the agenda of the Council... He worried our believers very much, because false rumors were spread that everyone would have to switch to a new style- continued the Primate. - So, the topic of the calendar issue was removed unanimously. Many Churches, as you know, adhere to the Julian calendar, some to the Gregorian, and in order to leave each Church the opportunity to act in accordance with the adopted calendar, it was decided that the calendar issue will not be considered at the Council. "

As His Holiness Patriarch Kirill said, among the materials that will be available soon - documents about the mission of Orthodoxy in the modern world, as well as about marriage, family and obstacles to marriage.

The Primate of the Russian Church emphasized that the participants of the meeting in Chambesy unanimously supported the position of the Moscow Patriarchate on the situation in Ukraine.

“The Council will not consider the Ukrainian theme, the possibility of granting autocephaly or legalizing schism will not be discussed, and this was publicly confirmed by Patriarch Bartholomew. He bluntly said that neither during nor after the Council no efforts would be made to legalize the schism, or to unilaterally grant autocephaly to someone, ”His Holiness said.

“Undoubtedly, I was heard. There was not a single voice that was against the facts I have outlined, and the interpretation of these facts in the mouths of the participants in the summit, which we call Synaxis, was exactly the same as in the mouth of the Patriarch of Moscow and All Russia. And this should be well understood by everyone who provoked this turmoil in Ukraine. This confusion, this split will not be supported by the Orthodox world. There is only one way to overcome the schism - this is negotiations and the achievement of results based on the sacred canons, ”stated His Holiness.

“The only Church in Ukraine recognized by all the Orthodox Churches of the world is the Ukrainian Orthodox Church,” Patriarch Kirill emphasized. - Those who want to be in communion with Ecumenical Orthodoxy must reunite with the Ukrainian Orthodox Church on the basis of the canons existing in Ecumenical Orthodoxy. There is no other way, and there is no other message to Ukraine on behalf of the Patriarchs today ”.

The Primate of the Russian Church specified that the island of Crete was chosen as the venue for the Pan-Orthodox Council, which has more than once become the venue for international theological conferences.

“This summit of Orthodox Primates was not without difficulties - this kind of dialogue is never easy. But we see that by the action of the grace of God we always reach unanimous decisions. All this happened here. I expect from the Council an even greater consolidation of the Orthodox world because in the face of what is happening in the world, in the face of the persecution that has befallen the Christian community, we must all work even more closely to solve the problems we face. I really hope that by the grace of God it will be so, ”summed up His Holiness Patriarch Kirill of Moscow and All Russia.

ISTANBUL CATHEDRAL AS A NATO OPERATION

Ecumenical cathedral in Istanbul is scheduled for Easter 2016, that is, on May 1 according to the Gregorian or Bolshevik calendar. In addition to the Russian Orthodox Church and Constantinople, Local Orthodox Churches from NATO countries will participate in the cathedral: Bulgarian, Romanian, Greek, Polish, Albanian, churches of the Czech lands and Slovakia. However, the Church of Constantinople itself, inhabiting the territory of Muslim Turkey, a NATO member, is also under the hood of this Russophobic and anti-Orthodox bloc.

With what zeal they bombed Orthodox Serbia in 1999! In total - 7 churches out of 13 intending to participate in the Pan-Orthodox Conference. The island of Cyprus positions itself as under the protection of NATO. Italian anti-globalist J. Chiesa writes about the former allies of the USSR in Eastern Europe: “As soon as these states gained independence from the Soviet Union, immediately, immediately sold their independence to the Americans. These are no longer independent states ... their ruling circles prefer to be vassals of America. " Moreover, they are many times more anti-Russian than the countries of the former, "old" Europe (Chiesa J. The world is on the verge of war. - M .: Knizhnyi mir, 2015, p. 35). Priest Sergiy Karamyshev also believes that"The Orthodox world, which is outside the Russian Church, is under certain control of NATO: Turkey, Greece, Cyprus, Bulgaria, Romania, Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia - all these countries are part of the military bloc aggressive towards Russia."

Really, it is difficult to imagine that the ecclesiastical hierarchy of these countries would be independent of their political class, of their authorities. And the authorities of the NATO countries are quite definitely disposed: together with the United States, they are waging a cold war with Russia. Together with the United States and the Vatican, NATO members, and especially Poland, fired up Bandera's Maidan in Kiev. Without their help and support, the coup d'état in Ukraine in February 2014 could not have taken place.

A mysterious coincidence is striking: the decision of the Constantinople Renovation Patriarch Bartholomew to convene a Pan-Orthodox Conference for Easter 2016 was adopted almost simultaneously with the Nazi coup in Kiev. Like a friend and ally of the United States, Bartholomew calculated (or received an assignment?) That now is the time to establish ecumenism as a mandatory doctrine of the Orthodox Church. And the rooting of ecumenism is, in fact, the dissolution and liquidation of the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church in the host of hostile confessions and heresies. It is important for the sons of perdition to deprive the Russian people and friendly ethnic groups of the spiritual core, the millennial Faith. After all It was not for nothing that the American slave Zbigniew Brzezinski proclaimed Holy Orthodoxy the main danger and the main enemy of the West that had renounced Christ.

Unfortunately, the territory of Orthodoxy is sharply reducing today. Bulgarian clerics - Archimandrite Seraphim (Aleksiev) and Archimandrite Sergiy (Yazadzhiev) - in their book Why an Orthodox Christian cannot be an ecumenist (St. Petersburg, 1992, p. 238) come to the bitter conclusion: “So, the whole so-called Christian world embarked on the path of apostasy - apostasy from the Christian Faith through unification with non-Christian and pagan religions. Researcher O.A. Platonov notes: “One of the main weapons of the struggle against Orthodoxy, the Judeo-Masonic leaders made ecumenism - a satanic movement for the subordination of the Russian Church to some external criminal force” (Platonov OA Russia and the world evil. M .: Algorithm, 2011, p. 443 ).

At the forefront of ecumenism and reformism is the Constantinople Orthodox Church. Its leaders began their heretical activities almost immediately after the overthrow of the Russian autocracy. In 1920, the locum tenens of the Patriarchal throne, Metropolitan Dorotheos of Prussia, issued an encyclical epistle "To the Churches of Christ all over the world," in which, arbitrarily, without having any rights to do so, on behalf of all Orthodox Churches, he declared that he considered it quite compatible for the rapprochement of the Orthodox Churches with those who had fallen away from True Christianity by Catholicism, Protestantism and other heretical denominations. The introduction of the Gregorian calendar was also proposed there.

Meanwhile, the Local Council held in Constantinople back in 1583 with the participation of the Patriarchs of Constantinople, Alexandria, Antioch and others imposed an anathema - excommunication - on all who, contrary to the decisions of the seven Ecumenical Councils, wish to follow the Gregorian calendar and month.

Another bishop, Meletios Metaxakis, elected to the throne of Constantinople on November 25, 1921 as a result of dishonest intrigues, convenes the so-called Pan-Orthodox Congress, which opened the gates to Renovationism and the way to change the patristic calendar. At the same time, the Patriarch-Mason establishes ties with the renovationists in the Soviet Union and subsidizes them. In the fall of 1923, Meletius was expelled in disgrace and hid for several years with his Masonic guardians in England, but in 1926, with the financial and organizational support of "free masons" and with direct pressure on the Egyptian authorities, Meletius was now elected Patriarch of Alexandria. He introduces the Gregorian Catholic calendar here too.

In 1924, the successors and disciples of Meletius in the Patriarchate of Constantinople finally introduced the Gregorian calendar, and, alas, they were followed by the Greek and Romanian Churches, and in 1948 the Orthodox Church of Antioch. The current Patriarch of Constantinople, Bartholomew, continuing the work of his predecessors, intends to impose a Catholic calendar on all Churches at the 8th robber cathedral.

In 1948, the World Council of Churches was created, in which the Russian Orthodox Church, as well as most of the Local Orthodox Churches, categorically refused to participate. But already in 1954, the Patriarch of Constantinople Athenagoras published an encyclical that called on the heads of all Orthodox Churches to join the WCC. What for? For "rapprochement of peoples and nations in order to solve the global problems of our time."

Beginning in 1952, individual Orthodox Churches began to join the WCC, and in 1955 the Patriarchate of Constantinople sent its envoys to Geneva, to the headquarters of the WCC. In 1964, Patriarch Athenagoras met with the Pope in Jerusalem, and the next, in 1965, Constantinople lifted the anathema from the Catholic Church, although she not only did not repent of the previous heresies, but just by 1965 she changed Christianity altogether, Judaizing her creed doctrine. Fr. Justin Popovich calls the WCC "a heretical, humanistic and man-pleasing council, consisting of 263 heresies, each of which means spiritual death."

The lifting of the anathema against the Vatican on December 7, 1965 was accompanied by the recognition of the Catholic Church as a sister church. As the Serbian hieromonk Savva (Janich) testifies, “not a single local church protested against this non-canonical and non-Orthodox act. Protests were sent only by individuals, as well as by the ROCOR and adherents of the old style "(Hieromonk Savva. Apostasy. M .: Russian idea. S. 30). The absence of such protests meant that the majority of Orthodox Churches, already in 1965, embarked on the path of apostasy. The pope's name is now included in the diptych of the Church of Constantinople. There is no doubt that the current Patriarch of Constantinople, Bartholomew, like Athenagoras, considers the Pope to be ahead of him. The meeting of Pope Paul VI and Patriarch Athenagoras in Jerusalem was the first meeting of the heads of Rome and Constantinople in 526 years, except for the meeting in Ferrara between Patriarch Joseph II and Pope Eugene IV. I would not be surprised if by the time the ecumenical council in Istanbul ends, the Pope will be recognized as the head of all sister churches. Anathema was abolished in both Constantinople and Rome. So, since 1965, the Patriarchate of Constantinople has recognized the Pope as the first bishop of Christianity.

It is pertinent to recall that on May 4, 2001, the visit of the Roman pontiff to Greece took place. In addition to Greece, Pope John Paul II also visited other Orthodox countries - Georgia, Bulgaria, Romania and Ukraine (Archpriest Theodore Zisis. Good disobedience or bad obedience. M .: Publishing house "Holy Mountain", 2009. P. 96). It is gratifying that, despite the zeal of Metropolitan Hilarion, an ardent ecumenist and philo-Catholic, our Church still did not defile herself with the “friendly” visit of the Pope. Patriarch Athenagoras died in 1972.

Standing for the unification of the "divided" church, the next Patriarch Demetrius, in his 1978 message, proclaims his goal: "A united church in a united society." “Constantinople persistently preaches a“ new humanistic Gospel ”, the essence of which is the unification of churches”, and then “the unification of all mankind” (Jer. Savva, p. 62). It is known that both Meletius and Athenagoras were Masons. There is no information about the formal affiliation of Patriarch Demetrius to Freemasonry, but all his activities are permeated with the Masonic spirit.

Hieromonk Savva writes: “... all the activities of the Patriarchs of Constantinople ... are preparations for "To the Great Ecumenical Council" which Constantinople has been preparing for more than one decade "(Jer. Savva, pp. 63–64).

On October 27, 1986, the First Joint Prayer of the representatives of all world religions took place in Assisi. This was the first such case in world history. In addition to the Pope, who was a key figure in the entire meeting, there were 150 representatives of world religions, including the Dalai Lama, African magicians, Indian gurus, Tibetan shamans, Protestants, Orthodox metropolitans, Indian sorcerers who smoked a pipe of peace. The delegation of the Patriarchate of Constantinople was headed by Methodius of Thyatira, the delegation of the Russian Church - then still Metropolitan, and now excommunicated by the defrocked Filaret (Denisenko).

From 9 to 20 February 1991 in Canberra (Australia), the 7th WCC conference was held. Its participants were not only numerous Protestant sects, but also representatives of the Orthodox Local Churches (except for the Jerusalem Patriarchate, which left the WCC), as well as a representative delegation of the Vatican (Cardinal Edward Cassidy). Unlike the previous convention in Vancouver in 1983, the conference was attended by many representatives of non-Christian religions. Spiritual Korean woman Chang summoned the spirit of ancestors and even dared to summon the spirit of Jesus of Nazareth. (For this alone, the Orthodox should have left the wicked assembly forever!) Fr. Justin calls the participation of the Serbian Orthodox Church in the WCC an unheard-of betrayal and a terrible insult.

On November 2, 1991, the solemn enthronement of Patriarch Bartholomew took place in Phanar. The ceremony was attended by a Vatican delegation led by Cardinal Edward Cassidy, a personal friend of Bartholomew, Archbishop of Canterbury, representatives of the WCC and various heresies. Bartholomew never once noted Orthodoxy as the only true doctrine. He spoke in favor of establishing a dialogue not only with Christian confessions, but also with non-Christians. He will demand the same at the 2016 Council in Istanbul.

Researcher O.N. Chetverikova believes: “The main task of the Holy See is at present to achieve recognition by the Orthodox Churches of the primacy of the Roman bishop, which is interpreted extremely broadly and conceivable as the supremacy of his power. The key role in its implementation is to be played by Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople (initiator of the 8th brigandine council. - Author's note), who takes a clearly pro-Catholic and at the same time pro-American position. He must approve in Orthodoxy the idea, borrowed from papism, of the Patriarch of Constantinople as the visible head of the Orthodox Church with special power prerogatives, so that, uniting all the Local Churches under his rule, put them under the control of the pope (this should be one of the goals of the wolf council. . Auth.), whose supremacy he is ready to recognize "(Chetverikova ON Treason in the Vatican, or the Conspiracy of Popes against Christianity. M .: Algorithm, 2011. S. 162).

A student of Catholic institutions, Bartholomew (patriarch since November 1991) actively worked in the World Council of Churches, was a member of the Central Committee and the executive committee of this ultra-ecumenical organization, in 2006, at his invitation, Pope Benedict XVI paid a visit to Istanbul, where they prayed together. In June 2008 Bartholomew paid a visit to the Vatican and also prayed together with heretics, for example, during an interfaith meeting, convened to fight fundamentalism, that is, canonical Orthodoxy. Patriarch Bartholomew is awarded the Gold Medal of the US Congress. On October 28, 2009, he visited the Park East Synagogue in New York. In 1998, the United States adopted a law on the protection of the Patriarchate of Constantinople, which “led to firm support for the latest American and NATO operations in Orthodox states (Georgia and Ukraine) and the“ color revolutions ”that took place there (Chetverikova ON S. 163).

An outstanding modern researcher who traveled around the West in search of actions of special services and Freemasons against Russia, O.A. Platonov gives quite important information that he learned from the repentant "moles": “At least several hierarchs of the Local Orthodox Churches are making contacts and cooperation with the leaders behind whom the CIA stands. The Patriarch of Constantinople, in his opinion, is fully supported by the American government, resolving through the CIA all the problems he has with the Turkish authorities. The American government considers it necessary in its interests to contribute to the development of the ecumenical movement, to promote the deep integration of the Orthodox Churches in it with the aim of reforming them in a liberal-modernist spirit "(Platonov OA Russia and the world evil. M .: Algorithm, 2011, p. 439 ).

The famous theologian, Archpriest Theodore Zisis writes:“Unfortunately, today church hierarchs prefer to maintain good relations with those in power, submitting to their worldly plans - syncretic, globalist, ecumenical ...” (Archpriest Fyodor Zisis. Good disobedience or bad obedience. M., 2009. S. 16).

At the height of Gorbachev's perestroika, the liberal press created a fuss about the ties between our clergy and the KGB. Much more serious and dangerous are the current ties with the CIA!

There is no doubt that

the preparation of the Pan-Orthodox Council in Istanbul by the Primate of Constantinople was coordinated and developed jointly with the CIA, the State Department and the White House. It is important for the Russophobic NATO bloc to deprive Russia of its spiritual core - the Holy Canonical Orthodoxy.

Deacon Vladimir Vasilik believes that after the revolution in Russia and the post-Versailles order of the world "In many Orthodox Churches, people associated with international Masonic circles have come to power".

“Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople, caring more about Catholicism than about Orthodoxy, seeks to bring the issue of Easter to the agenda of the Pan-Orthodox Council. The further, the more the dubious essence of the Pan-Orthodox Council is revealed ... " More recently, they tried to break through the issue of respect for "sexual minorities". Now the question about Easter ... “If this issue really gets on the agenda of the Council, and worse, this issue is adopted in a spirit pleasing to the Catholics, then this Council will undoubtedly become apostasy” (RNL, July 14, 2015).

Metropolitan Hilarion of Volokolamsk published an extensive article in the journal "Church and Time" (No. 58) "Inter-Orthodox cooperation in preparation for the Holy and Great Council of the Orthodox Church"... He begins by recording various bewilders, and sometimes "direct speculations in certain circles." “Some marginal media have launched a real campaign against the convocation of the Council,” the bishop writes. Recently His Beatitude Onufry, Metropolitan of Kiev and All Ukraine of the Moscow Patriarchate, spoke out firmly and decisively against the participation of our Church in the 2016 Council in Istanbul. Does Vladyka Hilarion consider him a marginal too? For the first time after the Seventh Ecumenical Council (787), the so-called Ecumenical Congress was organized in 1923 by the Renovation Patriarch of Constantinople, the Freemason Meletius Metaxakis. God's Anointed One was overthrown in Russia. The Freemasons of England and France, who considered themselves victors in the First World War of 1914-1918, established the New World Order with impunity. Templar Meletius was not disturbed by anyone.

Scientist O.A. Platonov writes: “The Congress opened the way for a change in the patristic church calendar and for the invasion of Renovationism into the Orthodox Church ... The Constantinople Congress succeeded in destroying the liturgical and calendar unity of the Orthodox Church. The reformed calendar was gradually introduced in many Local Churches ”(OA Platonov, op. Cit. P. 446).

And further: “The new calendar, introduced at the insistence of the Freemasons in a number of Orthodox Churches, marked the beginning of subversive activities within Orthodoxy. In contrast to the previous time, when the enemies of the faith were predominantly outside the Church, since the 1920s anti-Christian forces have penetrated the bosom of the Church itself. Associated, as a rule, with the Masonic underground and Jewish capital, these apostates, like wolves in sheep's clothing, are secretly working to revise, abolish and discredit the Apostolic and patristic traditions, church canons and dogmas ”(OA Platonov, op. P. 447).

Metropolitan Hilarion also agrees that at the congresses of the Patriarchate of Constantinople in 1923 and 1930 "there were attempts to approve certain provisions of an openly renovationist character." Although the preparation of the Cathedral in Istanbul began in 1923 on the initiative of the Freemason and Renovator Patriarch of Constantinople Meletius Metaxakis, Metropolitan Hilarion believes that the process of preparing this Council was really intensified in September 1961, when the first Pan-Orthodox Conference was convened on Fr. Rhodes in Greece.

A special role in this matter was played by the philo-Catholic Metropolitan Nikodim. At the first Pan-Orthodox pre-Council meeting, held on November 21-28 in Chambesy, Metropolitan Hilarion reports, the list of topics for the Council was reduced to ten (the Orthodox diaspora, autocephaly and the method of its proclamation, autonomy and the method of its proclamation, diptychs, the calendar issue, obstacles to marriage , alignment of church decrees on fasting, the attitude of the Orthodox Churches to the rest of the Christian world, Orthodoxy and the ecumenical movement, the contribution of the Local Orthodox Churches to the triumph of the Christian ideas of peace, freedom, brotherhood and love between nations and the elimination of racial discrimination).

The calendar question was voiced in 1923 by the Freemason and Renovationist Patriarch Meletios Metaxakis in order to introduce confusion and in order to please international Jewry, in order to Orthodox Christians used to celebrate Easter with the Jews. The so-called New Julian calendar has now been developed., the accuracy of which is higher than the Gregorian. The error of the Gregorian calendar will be one day in 3280 years. Both calendars are ahead of the canonical Julian by 13 days and will completely coincide until 2800. Freemasons and Renovationists can't wait to impose a new calendar on all Orthodox Christians. Thanks to the efforts of the Russian Church, according to Metropolitan Hilarion, it was stated that at present the transition of all Local Churches to the New Julian calendar is not possible. " Thanks to the sabotage of Constantinople (since 1923), Romania and Greece introduced the Catholic Gregorian calendar. The Russian, Serbian, Jerusalem Churches remained with the same Julian calendar. But the Patriarchate of Constantinople and some ethnogreek churches are currently practicing the New Julian calendar.

The issue of the attitude of the Orthodox Churches to the rest of the Christian world was discussed at the Inter-Orthodox Preparatory Commission in 1986, which adopted a draft decision, in which “attention was paid to the dialogues of the Orthodox Church with Roman Catholics, Old Catholics, Lutherans, Anglicans, Reformed and representatives of the Ancient Eastern Churches, was approved at the Pan-Orthodox Pre-Council Meeting in 1986 ”.

Such dialogues are usually conducted along the line of recognition of the blessedness of the listed heresies. Metropolitan Hilarion, of course, is aware of the anti-Orthodox character of the 1986 document and is forced to note that “since 1986, many parameters of the inter-Christian dialogue have undergone serious changes. For example, a number of Protestant denominations have deviated into extreme forms of liberalism, legitimizing such phenomena as the female priesthood and female episcopate, same-sex unions and the ordination of those who are in them to the priesthood. Due to these circumstances, the ROC broke off dialogue with a number of Protestant groups. " Vladyka should have added that not only with Protestants, who from the very beginning, that is, from the 16th century, were outside the Truth, but also with Roman Catholics after the revolutionary Second Vatican Council of 1962-1965, which Judaized Catholicism and, in fact, , betrayed Christ, there can be no dialogue.

Finally, the main section, the most important in the article by Metropolitan Hilarion of Volokolamsk: "Orthodoxy and the Ecumenical Movement." The hierarch writes: “In 1997, the Council of Bishops of the ROC considered the issue of ecumenism and whether the ROC could remain a member of the WCC. It was decided to discuss the problem of the modern ecumenical movement at the pan-Orthodox level. The Pan-Orthodox Conference was convened at the initiative of the Russian and Serbian Orthodox Churches in the spring of 1998 in Thessaloniki. The participants in the meeting testified that during all the years of the existence of the World Council of Churches, the doctrinal and moral gap between Orthodox and non-Orthodox not only did not decrease, but even increased. It was stated that the current structure of the WCC, the decision-making mechanism, the organization of joint prayers are unacceptable for the Orthodox Churches. They will either leave the Council, or the Council must be radically reformed. The meeting decided on the need to create a parity bilateral commission for dialogue between the WCC and the Orthodox Churches. The author of the idea was the chairman of the DECR of the Moscow Patriarchate, Metropolitan Kirill (now - His Holiness Patriarch of Moscow and All Russia). "

In 1948 our Church resolutely refused to join the WCC. But in 1961, the persecutors of Orthodoxy, Khrushchev and Suslov, who annually closed a thousand churches a year and destroyed a thousand churches, pushed the ROC into the pool of the WCC. They did this exclusively to the detriment of the ROC, so that, firstly, there would be a canonical damage to the Orthodox faith under the pressure of heretics, secondly, so that the church nomenclature would become masoned and, thirdly, so that the Church would extract chestnuts from the fire for the godless CPSU, that is, bring ideological and political information useful to partners.

In 1991, communism collapsed (thanks to the betrayal of its own leaders), but the hierarchs had already become Masonry, infected with the bacilli of the New World Order. To please Gorbachev, the so-called autonomy of the Ukrainian and Belarusian Churches was granted, spiritually paving the way for the disintegration of the USSR along the Bolshevik patterns and giving way within the Church to modernists and reformists with the prospect of replacing the Church Slavonic language in worship, cooperation with the Vatican, cosmopolitanism, ecumenism, etc. ...

Since 1961, our bishops have been flying to the WCC Assemblies, where they really liked it. During this time, the Protestants who dominate the WCC have sunk to the female priesthood and female episcopate, to the recognition of same-sex marriage and "humility" before the ninth wave of the sexual and anti-moral revolution. And we, instead of slamming the door, as the Georgian and Jerusalem Churches did, continue to cooperate with inveterate heretics. At first they assured us that we would enlighten the apostates with our Holy Faith, but for all 54 years they did not enlighten anyone, and they could not enlighten anyone, since theological dialogues were not allowed in the WCC.

And now we will create a parity bilateral commission for dialogue between the WCC and the Orthodox Church? Will Protestants give up anti-church reforms and homosexuality? Yes, we must leave this unholy lair without delay!

Metropolitan Hilarion's article also raises the question "of the contribution of the Local Orthodox Churches to the triumph of the Christian ideas of peace, freedom, brotherhood and love among peoples and the elimination of racial discrimination."

The adherents of the convocation of the Council in Istanbul seem to live on another planet. They seem not to see the revolutionary breakdown of the family, morality and even the binary code of humanity with the elimination of the concepts of "man", "woman", "father" and "mother", "boy" and "girl", carried out in recent years by the governments of Europe, the United States, Canada, Australia and other countries. And not seeing the moral catastrophe taking place before our eyes, they continue to hover in the clouds of "freedom, equality, brotherhood" of the era of Robespierre and "racial discrimination". At the head of the world's leading superpower is the Negro, South Africa has long changed from black racism to racism against whites, and our theologians continue to talk about "discrimination." However, one of the Swiss documents also spoke about "other" discrimination, that is, it is, of course, about the fight against discrimination against perverts for the sake of the World Government.

According to the scientist O.N. Chetverikov, “... exactly half a century ago, a coup took place within the Catholic Church, which marked the beginning of the establishment of the heresy of the Judaizers within Catholicism, carried out under the guise of a Judeo-Catholic“ dialogue ”. We are talking about the adoption of the Declaration of Nostra Aetate in 1965, which changed the Christian teaching about the Church of Christ and adopted the Jewish view of the relationship between the Old and New Testaments and the chosenness of the Jewish people. " As you know, this chosenness was taken away from the Jews after they crucified the Son of God - Jesus Christ. " But "Judaism affirmed and continues to affirm the exclusive right of the Jews, guaranteed by the very fact of birth, to a dominant position in the world." The revolutionary document was the Declaration "The Attitude of Christians to Judaism" adopted by the French Episcopal Conference in April 1978. It clearly stated that “it is impossible to deduce from the New Testament the conclusion that the Jewish people have lost their chosenness”, that “the first Testament was not canceled by the New and the doctrine of the Pharisees is not opposite to Christianity, which means that the vocation of the Jewish people remains unchanged, which even today is "a blessing to all the peoples of the earth." In "gratitude" for the four radical revolutions (Dutch, English, French and Bolshevik), for the stock exchange and bills, for godless capitalism and anti-Christ globalization? The document categorically condemns the "accusation of the Jews of deicide", which can be interpreted as a refusal to recognize Christ as God. The new catechism of the Catholic Church in 1992 places the main blame for the suffering of Christ on Christians.

In passing, I will note that we, in the Russian Orthodox Church, are planning to adopt a new catechism. Already on 2–3 February 2016 at the Bishops' Council. The catechism is being prepared by Metropolitan Hilarion of Volokolamsk, an ardent champion of the meeting of the pontiff with our Patriarch. The believers have already regarded the draft of the new catechism as the "February anti-Orthodox revolution." On April 13, 1986, Pope John Paul II (1978-2005) visited a synagogue for the first time in the history of Catholicism. The Pope not only met, but entered into prayer fellowship with the Chief Rabbi of Rome, Dr. Elio Toaf. What became a demonstrative violation of church canons prohibiting religious communication with Jews. His speech to the Jews was entitled "You Are Our Elder Brothers." The Catholic Church has banned the conversion of Jews to Christianity. From all official documents of Catholicism, materials about the responsibility of the Jews for the murder of Christ began to be removed; when citing the Bible, it was recommended to exclude all the words of Christ against the Jews.

It was not by chance that Patriarch Bartholomew chose the time of convening the Pan-Orthodox Conference for Easter 2016, that is, on May 1 (according to the new style): the end of political upheavals: color revolutions inspired by the United States and NATO in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, Syria, and where it is difficult - direct unprovoked aggression (against Iraq), and, finally, Ukraine, where a powerful Bandera fist has been created against Russia, the main opponent of the Masonic West. Simultaneously with the political earthquake, an unprecedented spiritual war was launched against Christianity: the pogrom of the traditional family, the legalization and inculcation of homosexuality and other perversions, the elimination of the binary code of mankind - and just against this background, supposedly in the name of “freedom, brotherhood and love”, an ecumenical gathering was planned in Istanbul. The enemies of Orthodoxy believe that it is precisely these accompanying circumstances, especially the explosion in Ukraine and the West's public renunciation of Christian ethics and doctrine, that will help dissolve and drown Orthodoxy at the Council in Istanbul.

The heretic Bartholomew acts assertively and boldly. Archbishop Jerome and All Greece of Athens and the Patriarch of Antioch announced that they were under pressure from the Primate of Constantinople. Direct compulsion to the Pan-Orthodox Conference and submission to the Phanar. The Mason demands that everyone march in step with him.

A number of Orthodox leaders and priests doubt the need for an Ecumenical Conference, especially in such a turbulent time as now. Turkey shoots down our bomber, attacks Russia, and we will ask Erdogan to send us to Constantinople to drown Orthodoxy with heretics. An authoritative statement was made by the Metropolitan of Kiev and All Russia Onuphrius on December 28, 2015, in which the All-Beatitude proposes to refuse to participate in this Council. "Participation in it can be more evil than refusal to participate." Vladyka warns against diktat and pressure at the Council, against imposing, allegedly "for the sake of unity", anti-canonical decisions, against temptation, strife and a booth. “I think that we need to pray to God, ask Him to take away this temptation that is approaching the Holy Orthodox Church, so that God will keep us in faith. There is no need to look for a new Faith. " And in the "Nezavisimaya Gazeta" dated September 16, 2015, it was reported that at the beginning of September 2015, the Synaxis (Council) of the Constantinople Orthodox Church was held in Istanbul, at which Bartholomew vigorously advocated ecumenism and recognition by the Church of otherness.

The article in "Nezavisimaya" was titled "Moscow was credited with a universal scale. Criticism of the Russian Orthodox Church was heard in the words of the Patriarch of Constantinople. " At this council, Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople declared "the priority right of his see to ensure the unity of the Orthodox world and plans for the development of ecumenical ties, especially with regard to Catholicism." The Renovation Patriarch Bartholomew, a friend and ally of the United States and, consequently, of the entire world behind the scenes, especially dwelled on "criticism of certain Churches" infected with nationalism ", which hinders the preparation for the upcoming Pan-Orthodox Council next year." Many logically regarded this philippic as aimed at the Moscow Patriarchate, although the Freemason Patriarch Bartholomew never mentioned the Russian Orthodox Church. Bartholomew himself does not have a homeland, he will not consider Muslim Turkey his homeland. All Constantinople patriarchs of the twentieth century are cosmopolitans, citizens of the world, today they are spiritual citizens of the Russophobic North Atlantic military bloc, their soul and their heart are there. Naturally, the statist position of our Hierarchy is unacceptable for them, first of all, Patriarch Kirill, who constantly speaks from patriotic and statist positions for the preservation of the spiritual and national identity of our people. It is unacceptable for Bartholomew to defend the national interests of Russia by our Church. Phanar prefers that we are under the ideological protectorate of the United States. And in the same speech, Bartholomew vigorously advocated "ecumenism and the recognition of otherness by the Church."

So, Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople is preparing for the Pan-Orthodox Conference on May 1, 2016 in Istanbul an act on the approval of ecumenism as a mandatory doctrine of Orthodoxy, the imposition of the Pope as the head of "all churches", a single Catholic calendar and other reforms that undermine the canonical purity of the United Holy Cathedral and Apostolic Church.
But the Orthodox, relying on the foundation of the Seven Ecumenical Councils, on the Holy Tradition and the Holy Fathers, are not on their way with the new Reformation.

Draft documents of the Pan-Orthodox Council published