The comedy “Woe from Wit” is a brilliant work by A. Griboedov. In it, the author talks about the life of noble Moscow in the 19th century. At this time, the foundations of the old era began to change, new, progressive Decembrist ideas were born. The comedy depicts the conflict between two eras, “the present century and the past century.” Representatives of the current century were progressive-minded people, such as the main character of the comedy Alexander Andreevich Chatsky. And representatives of the past century were irreconcilable conservatives, for example, Alexei Stepanovich Molchalin. Thus, Chatsky and Molchalin are representatives of two different public camps.
Chatsky and Molchalin belong to the same generation in age, they are young, and have certain views on life. Each of them is smart in their own way. Chatsky was brought up in Famusov’s house since childhood, but now he does not live there. And Molchalin is the collegiate secretary and this moment lives in Famusov's house. It is worth noting that Molchalin, unlike Chatsky, belongs to the Famusov Society.
Alexey Andreevich Chatsky is a poor nobleman who received a good education. From an early age he was brought up in Famusov's house due to the death of his parents. As a child, he was good friends with Sophia. Having returned from abroad, he realized that he was in love with a girl, but she, in turn, did not reciprocate his feelings. Yes, and Sophia’s father was against marriage, because he believed that “whoever is poor is not a match for you,” and Chatsky had only 400 souls, which, according to Famusov, is not enough. By nature, Alexander Andreevich is a revolutionary, dreaming of selfless service to the Fatherland. A bright representative of the “present century”. Chatsky is hostile to the Famusov society, because representatives of this society suffer from veneration, careerism and hypocrisy. People who are completely opposite to Chatsky in character and life goals. And that is why he is not understood in this society and is mistaken for a madman. The image of Chatsky is a type of enlightened person who freely expresses his opinion.
Alexey Stepanovich Molchalin is Famusov’s secretary. He is a peasant by origin, but strives to achieve success in society, receive a high rank, and become an influential person. He follows his father's instructions. In appearance, Molchalin seems modest, meek, quiet and compliant. But this is just a mask that he created to achieve his goal, and his goal is rank and wealth. Sophia is in love with Molchalin, and at the same time he is crazy about the maid Liza, and meets Sophia only for the sake of rank. Molchalin tries to please everyone everywhere, because he believes that just one word spoken to an influential person is enough to receive a rank or good location. Molchalin’s main life principle is sycophancy and servility to superiors, which is why he is a member of the “Famus society.” Molchalin is a saint of modern times, acting subtly and very successfully.
Thus, Chatsky and Molchalin are completely opposite people. A.S. Griboedov created typical characters: Chatsky is a type of fighter, revolutionary, not afraid to express his point of view. Molchalin is a type of flatterer whose main goal is to please his superiors in order to achieve his goal. A. Griboyedov, depicting the types of Chatsky and Molchalin, invited contemporaries and descendants to make their moral choice, because in our time we can find similar heroes. Therefore, we must think about and set ourselves the right life goals. On the one hand, achieving your goals through flattery and servility is effective, but it is more important to remain a person with great moral principles. Chatsky is exactly the person from whom we can learn this.
Together with the article “Essay on the topic: Chatsky and Molchalin in the comedy “Woe from Wit”” read:
Share:“Woe from Wit” is a realistic work where A.S. Griboyedov gives a picture of the life of serfs in Moscow in the nineteenth
century. The content of the comedy is revealed primarily as a clash and change of two great eras of Russian life - the “century
present" and "past century". It (the clash) was an expression of the struggle between two political camps - the feudal camp
reaction, defenders of serfdom in the person of Famusov, and the camp of advanced noble youth, whose image is embodied
Griboyedov in Chatsky.
The world of the Famusovs consists not only of feudal aces like Famusov and Skalozub, but also of those who serve them,
fawning officials - silent ones. If Famusov and Chatsky are people of different generations, then Molchalin and Chatsky are
peers. The sharper the contrast between them. They oppose each other, and this opposition manifests itself both in love,
and in social conflicts. Molchalin is a staunch conservative, therefore the dialogue and mutual understanding between him and Chatsky
are impossible, and conflict is inevitable - their life ideals and behavior in society are absolutely opposite.
Molchalin is poor and rootless, but he set himself the goal of achieving “the level of famous.” And if it weren’t for Famusov,
Molchalin would have had to “smoke in Tver,” that is, serve with a minimum salary and almost without any opportunity
advance. However, Molchalin knows how to behave:
First, please all people without exception -
The owner, where he will live,
To the authorities with whom I will serve,
To his servant who cleans dresses,
Doorman, janitor, to avoid evil,
To the janitor's dog, so that it is affectionate.
Like Skalozub, Molchalin “has many channels to get rank.” For several years spent in Moscow, he managed
have a good career. But the main thing is that he managed to establish necessary connections and make useful contacts. Unlike
Chatsky, Molchalin fits into Famus society. This is “little Famusov”, because he has a lot in common with Moscow
"ace". For example, Molchalin’s attitude towards service is purely “Famusov’s”: he would like to “win awards and have fun
live." Molchalin considers dependence “on others” to be the basic law of life. Chatsky cannot understand “why are opinions
strangers are only holy.” Public opinion is sacred for Molchalin: “Ah! Evil tongues are worse than a pistol.”
Chatsky comes from a noble family. He is a hereditary nobleman and received a good education. Chatsky has
Rich life experience, he traveled a lot, lived both in the village and abroad. Chatsky calls “the present century”
century of enlightenment and in every possible way praises the craving for knowledge, sciences and “high and beautiful” arts. Chatsky does not require
“no places, no promotion to rank.” He is ready to serve at the behest of duty, to “serve the cause”: “I would be glad to serve, to serve
sickening."
Chatsky is talented, “his speech is full of intelligence, wit,” he always says what he thinks, “he has a heart, and, moreover,
he is impeccably honest." Molchalin’s “talents” consist of “moderation and accuracy.” He is modest and helpful, because
that “in the ranks of “small”” cannot exist without “patrons.” Molchalin is a man devoid of dignity and honor, ready
to humiliate himself, to fawn, a person who does not have “his own judgments”, dependent on others. Slave morality is unacceptable to
Chatsky. “Why are other people’s opinions only sacred?” - he asks Molchalin with irony. He himself freely and directly expresses
his opinions, does not take into account the opinion of the world, does not depend on anyone, he does not attach of great importance connections in society,
he doesn't need patronage. Chatsky fearlessly says what he thinks about “aces”. If the “emptiest man” is placed in
a sample, it means absolutely nothing to him. Foma Fomich, as he was, will remain for Chatsky “one of the most
stupid”, but powerful and well-connected!
Tatyana Yuryevna is “absurd.” For Chatsky, Molchalin is a complete nonentity, “the most pitiful creature”:
Helpful, modest, with a blush in his face.
Here he is on tiptoe and not rich in words.
In turn, Molchalin does not value Chatsky at all. In his eyes, Chatsky is a loser: “You were not given ranks,
service failure?
Molchalin is the antipode of Chatsky not only in his beliefs, but also in the nature of his attitude towards Sofia. “Warmed” by Famusov,
he deftly plays the role of a man in love with Sophia:
And now I take the form of a lover
To please the daughter of such a man
Chatsky’s love for Sophia is a sincere, ardent feeling. There is no secrecy, no falsehood in him. He's firmly
I am convinced that Sophia cannot fall in love with Molchalin:
With such feelings, with such a soul
We love you!.. The liar laughed at me!
When Molchalin’s hypocrisy towards Sophia was revealed, he simply chickened out. He crawls humiliatingly in front of a girl
not because he feels guilty, but because his career may suffer. Molchalin will probably redouble his efforts to
make amends to Sophia. It is impossible to stop the career of a person like Molchalin; he will “reach the degrees
famous."
Alas, “The silent ones are blissful in the world.” Chatsky underestimated Molchalin, he suffers defeats, but morally
remains the winner. Personalities like Chatsky “live and are not translated in society; they will always appear” when
sharp transitions from one century to another."
Chatsky and Molchalin are rivals in the fight for Sophia’s heart
One of the main features of the comedy “Woe from Wit” by A.S. Griboyedov is the presence of two conflicts in it: love and social. Both storylines They are closely related to each other, and they are also united by some heroes. Chatsky and Molchalin in the comedy “Woe from Wit” are both rivals in the fight for the heart of Sophia, Famusov’s daughter, and opposing sides on many social issues.
Main character plays Alexander Andreevich Chatsky returns to Famusov's house after a three-year stay abroad. He left his beloved Sophia here and is now coming to her with serious intentions, in love and full of hope. But during Chatsky’s absence, Sophia began to look at their youthful romance differently and now calls it childish. Her heart is occupied by Molchalin, her father's modest and taciturn secretary, who lives in their house.
Chatsky's tragedy begins with the fact that he does not understand why Sophia has lost interest in him, and tries to find the reason for this. The second blow for the main character is that Molchalin was preferred to him, about whom Chatsky sarcastically said: “He just has little intelligence.” The characterization of Molchalin and Chatsky will help to understand why Sophia makes such a choice.
Why does Sophia prefer Molchalin over Chatsky?
Sofya Famusova, although not one of the zealous defenders of the “past century,” is still her father’s daughter. The ideals of noble society were instilled in her from childhood. Although she is not like the conservative nobles of her circle, she absorbed many of the principles of their life with her father’s upbringing.
When in the first act of the comedy between Sophia and Lisa there is a conversation about Chatsky. It becomes clear that for her their love remained only a childhood memory. Of Chatsky’s merits, she singles out only his ability to make everyone laugh, but “you can share laughter with everyone.” With these words, she seems to absolve herself of responsibility for the fact that she is now playing a love game with Molchalin.
How do Chatsky and Molchalin appear before the reader in the comedy “Woe from Wit”?
Sophia herself characterizes Chatsky as follows: “Oster, smart, eloquent, especially happy with friends...” But the girl cannot understand and believe how a man in love can leave his beloved for three years for unknown purposes: “Ah! If someone loves someone, why bother searching and traveling so far?”
Arriving in Moscow, Chatsky arouses Sophia’s anger not only by jeopardizing her happiness with Molchalin. He also begins the conversation with Sophia by attacking her family and friends: “What about your father? All the English club is an old, faithful member to the grave? Has your uncle jumped back his eyelid?”
Chatsky himself does not understand why his words offend Sophia. He finds nothing wrong with them. The hero justifies himself by saying that his “mind and heart are not in harmony.”
But most of all, Sophia is hurt by Chatsky’s words about Molchalin. She sees in him a character from the novels that she reads. In her imagination, he is endowed with the features of a romantic hero. Chatsky immediately figured out Molchalin and his role in Famus society. Molchalin is “helpful and modest,” which means “he will reach the famous levels, because nowadays they love the dumb.”
Why will none of the heroes be with Sophia in the finale of the comedy?
In one of the episodes of the comedy “Woe from Wit,” Chatsky and Molchalin collide in a verbal duel, and the reader gradually begins to reveal the true face of Molchalin, who turns out to be not as simple as he seems at first glance.
Molchalin, like all the representatives of the “past century” hated by Chatsky, strives to obtain a high rank and position in society at any cost. Since he doesn’t have all this yet, he “needs to depend on others.” Chatsky doesn’t understand this: “Why is it necessary?” But Molchalin seems to have a clear life plan. He tries in every possible way to serve Famusov’s guests, praising the fur of Khlestova’s dog, which looks ridiculous and humiliating. He lives by the principle: “At my age I should not dare to have my own opinion.”
Molchalin is very proud of even his small successes in the service and boasts of them to Chatsky: “As I work and effort, since I am listed in the archives, I have received three awards.” Molchalin even dares to express sympathy for Chatsky due to the fact that he does not serve. He recommends that Chatsky improve relations with Tatyana Yuryevna, who “gives balls that couldn’t be richer.” She can help in obtaining the next rank or award, because “officials and officials are all her friends and all her relatives.” This is how people in Famusov’s circle are used to earning a position in society. Such is Molchalin.
Supporters of the “past century” do not understand Chatsky’s desire to serve “the cause, not individuals.” If Molchalin uses the ball as an opportunity to find channels for moving up the career ladder, then Chatsky prefers to separate time for fun and for business: “When in business, I hide from fun, when fooling around, I’m fooling around, and there are a lot of skilled people mixing these two crafts, I’m not one of them.”
The images of Chatsky and Molchalin in the comedy “Woe from Wit” are completely different. Chatsky has a fresh, active mind. He is brave both in love and in defending his views. Molchalin is unhurried and cautious both in society and in feelings. In his relationship with Sophia, he constantly thinks about how the world will react to their connection if it suddenly opens up, because “evil tongues are worse than a gun.” It's amazing that such different heroes could arouse love in the same woman.
This mystery will be revealed at the end of the play. Molchalin achieves Sophia's favor through deception. Under the mask of a silent and modest man hides a two-faced hero who takes on the appearance of a lover only “to please the daughter of such a man.” He has no love for Sophia and no serious intentions towards her, unlike Chatsky.
However, Chatsky, having spent one day in the company of Moscow nobles, understands that his views are forever at odds with the views of Famus society. And Sophia for him is now a part, a child of that world into which he has no entry. He recommends that she make peace with Molchalin, whom she exposed. After all, this hero fully corresponds to the ideal of a husband accepted in the world: “A boy-husband, a servant-husband, one of a wife’s pages—the high ideal of all Moscow husbands.”
conclusions
Chatsky and Molchalin in Griboyedov’s comedy “Woe from Wit” are heroes who are completely different in nature and in value guidelines. If society rejects Chatsky and accepts Molchalin, it means that it characterizes itself in accordance with this hero. Moscow nobles want to be worshiped, curried, and won over. They hold ceremonial worship and careerism in high esteem. Molchalin fits these ideals perfectly. Chatsky is superfluous in this society of people “passionate for rank.”
Characteristics of the images of Molchalin and Chatsky, the contrast of these characters can be used by 9th grade students in their essays on the topic “Famus society in the comedy “Woe from Wit””
Work test
Essays on literature: Chatsky and Molchalin."Woe from Wit" by Griboedov is a socio-political realistic comedy, "one of the most topical works of Russian literature." The comedy "Go" was written in the 20s of the 19th century, when after Patriotic War In 1812, changes took place in Russian society, when dissatisfaction with the existing order was brewing among the progressively minded nobility. The author reveals the content of the main conflict of the era: the collision of the “present century” and the “past century”, which does not want to give up its positions. The ASG contrasted the main character with the rest of the characters, representatives of the conservative part of society. The author himself pointed this out, explaining the main meaning of his comedy: “In my play there are 25 fools for one sane person.” The role of Alexander Andreevich Chatsky - the main role in comedy. Among the “twenty-five fools”, Alexey Stepanovich Molchalin is of great importance. Chatsky and Molchalin are not only stage characters who contribute to the development of the action, but also social types.
Chatsky and Molchalin are approximately the same age, but in everything else they are sharply different from each other. They oppose each other, and this opposition manifests itself in both love and social conflicts. Chatsky is talented, “his speech is full of intelligence and wit,” he always says what he thinks, “he has a heart, and, moreover, he is impeccably honest.” Molchalin’s “talents” consist of “moderation and accuracy.” Behind the mask of the wordless, modest, quiet, helpful secretary Famusov hides an unprincipled careerist, a heartless and hypocritical egoist. Chatsky comes from a noble family. He is a hereditary nobleman and received a good education. Alexander Andreich has a wealth of life experience, he has traveled a lot, lived both in the village and abroad.
Chatsky calls the “present century” the age of enlightenment and in every possible way praises the craving for knowledge, sciences and arts, “high and beautiful.” The rootless tradesman Molchalin was probably brought up worse than Chatsky. And if not for Famusov, Molchalin would have had to “smoke in Tver,” that is, serve with a minimum salary and almost without any opportunity to advance. However, Molchalin “inherited” one very “valuable” piece of advice from his father: My father bequeathed to me: First, to please all people without exception - the Master, where I happen to live, the Chief, with whom I will serve, his Servant, who cleans dresses, the Doorman , to the janitor, to avoid evil, to the janitor’s dog, so that it is affectionate. For Molchalin it is impossible to imagine a successful life without promotion. A career for him is the shortest and easiest path to honors and nobility. He associates service not with a sense of duty to the fatherland, but with awards and ranks. Thus, Alexey Stepanovich Molchalin has already received “three awards” and a title of nobility. Chatsky does not demand “neither places nor promotion to rank.”
He is ready to serve at the behest of duty, to “serve the cause”: I would be glad to serve, but it is sickening to be served. Chatsky, possessing a Decembrist worldview, appears in the comedy as an uncompromising fighter against the landowner-autocratic system. The meaning of Molchalin’s life is “to win awards and have fun.” The heroes' attitudes towards love are also opposite. Chatsky loves Sophia purely, sincerely. After all, it was only for her that he came to patriarchal Moscow.
Molchalin is not capable of deep and sincere feeling: And so I take on the form of a lover to please the daughter of such a person... He loves Sophia “by position”, Lisa - “out of boredom”. Love for him is another means to achieve his base goals. Alexander Andreich is a freedom-loving hero. He does not take into account the opinion of the world, does not depend on anyone, he does not attach much importance to connections in society, and he does not need patronage. Chatsky fearlessly says what he thinks about the “aces”. If the “emptiest man” in “Famus society” is “put as a model,” then this means absolutely nothing to Chatsky. Foma Fomich was and will remain for Alexander Andreich “one of the most stupid”, and the imperious and powerful Tatyana Yuryevna is “nonsensical”.
Moreover, Chatsky will passionately denounce the class prejudices of the conservative nobility. This is the main difference between Chatsky and Molchalin. Molchalin firmly follows his father’s “will”: There he will pet the pug in time! It's time to rub the card in! But this desire to please everyone has for him also negative side. Molchalin might be happy to express his opinion, but he cannot.
He says: “At my age I should not dare to have my own opinion.” Dependence on others is a necessity for him. IN morally Chatsky is undoubtedly much richer than Molchalin. Chatsky does not take Molchalin seriously, does not see him as a worthy opponent, for him Molchalin is a complete nonentity, “a most pitiful creature.” But Molchalin doesn’t value Chatsky, who in his eyes is an ordinary loser. Chatsky underestimated Molchalin, and Molchalin did not understand Chatsky’s worldview at all.
Chatsky - new person. “Famusov’s society” stands in his way, but the Molchalins turn out to be stronger and more resilient. “Silent people are blissful in the world!” These words of Chatsky turned out to be prophetic: Silent people are eternal. But such heroic personalities as Chatsky will always appear during the abrupt change of one century to another.
And this testifies to the true “immortality” of comedy. Chatsky is defeated, but morally remains a winner. Chatsky, endowed with temperament and a lively mind, is actively fighting against Famus society, but he does not see his main opponent, Molchalin. The main character is not able to take him and his “abilities” seriously, but in fact this “most pitiful creature” is not so insignificant. During his absence, he took a place in Sofia's heart. The words thrown by Chatsky - “Silent people are blissful in the world” - turned out to be prophetic. It is precisely people of this type, whose ideal is “to win awards and have fun,” who, in the opinion of the protagonist, will rise to the top of society because the authorities value “moderation and accuracy,” as well as “the dumb.” Intelligence, cunning, resourcefulness, the ability to find the “key” to every influential person are the main qualities of Silent. His views on life are opposite to Chatsky's ideals.
In this way, Molchalin is similar to Famus society. During the three years of Chatsky's absence, he achieved incredible success. An unknown, rootless tradesman received the rank of assessor and became Sofia's lover. Calculatingly and coldly, he gains strength, stopping at nothing, even deceiving a defenseless girl. He is ready to endure any humiliation in the struggle for power. No one can stand in his way. Chatsky not only rejects outdated forms of life, but also encourages everyone to do so. The main character is a caring, active person; it even seems to me that he is a typical representative of the Decembrists.
He despises sycophancy, passion for rank, and spiritual emptiness. His speech is full of intelligence and wit. He is an honest person with a healthy sense of humor who sees the shortcomings of others and openly ridicules them, without fear of anyone. All this nobility is the opposite of Molchalin’s qualities. With this work, the author calls for a fight against people like Molchalin and Famusov. It seems to me that such people still exist today because it is very difficult to “unravel” their deceitful natures and they always find “weak” people to boss around. It follows from this that Famusov and Molchalin society is growing and developing.
Griboedov's comedy "Woe from Wit" is an outstanding work of Russian and world drama. The author poses and resolves problems that were important for his time: about public service, about patriotism, about human relationships. It shows grief smart person forced to live in a society alien to him. The main character of the comedy is Alexander Andreevich Chatsky. This is a young, educated nobleman. He is noble, honest, smart. He is struck by the emptiness and vulgarity of life in Moscow society. The main character exposes his vices: groveling before his superiors, servility and servility. Chatsky wants to serve the Fatherland, and not some “persons”: “I would be glad to serve, it’s sickening to be served.”
He condemns the Moscow nobles who are trying to “recruit teachers for the regiment, in larger numbers, at a cheaper price.” In this society, Chatsky is a stranger. He turned out to be a lone fighter. Exhausted by this struggle, he leaves: Get out of Moscow! I don't go here anymore. I’m running, I won’t look back, I’ll go looking around the world, Where there is a corner for an offended feeling!..
This article discusses two of Griboedov's most famous characters from the famous comedy "Woe from Wit" - Chatsky and Molchalin. An essay in which it is necessary to compare these characters has long been included in the school curriculum. In this article we will present a plan for a possible essay and consider its points. In addition, we will conduct detailed comparative characteristics heroes.
Essay “Woe from Wit”: Chatsky and Molchalin.
A plan for any speech development task that involves writing your own text is impossible without detail. Let's try to compose it:
- A short description of the comedy.
- Description of the image of Molchalin.
- Description of the image of Chatsky.
- Comparison of heroes.
- Summarizing.
About the product
The main characters of the play “Woe from Wit” are Chatsky and Molchalin. It is better to start the essay with a description of the work itself.
So, in the comedy, the author reflected the morals and behavior of society in the period from 1808 to 1824, and the action itself takes place after the War of 1812. Griboedov raises the most important problems of this time: patriotism, public service, serfdom, decadence in the spheres of education and enlightenment, human relationships. And all these issues are considered from two angles - from the point of view of people of the “present century” and the “past century”. It is in the struggle of Molchalin and Chatsky that the struggle of these generations is most clearly reflected.
Image of Molchalin
But why are Chatsky and Molchalin so different? The essay should provide a comprehensive answer to this question. Let's start by considering the image of Molchalin. He has his own ideals, beliefs and purpose in life. These are his goals - a high position in society, career, wealth. For Molchalin, the meaning of life lies in one’s own well-being: “to have fun and win awards.” To achieve his goal, he is ready to do anything - cunning, flattering, deceiving, dodging. This is what he himself says about it: “to please everyone without exception.” But this applies only to those who are higher in rank. With those who are lower than him, he does not stand on ceremony.
The image of Chatsky
We started talking about how Chatsky and Molchalin are different. The essay must include characteristics of both characters, so let's talk about Alexander Chatsky. He is an educated young nobleman, distinguished by progressive views, a typical representative of the “present century.” Chatsky is ready for selfless service to the Fatherland and wants to benefit people. The hero despises careerism, veneration, hypocrisy and pretense. This character is very close to the Decembrists in his beliefs. Chatsky does not approve of serfdom, treats the Russian people with respect, respects national culture and the Russian language. He treats Molchalin with obvious contempt.
Attitude towards love
Our essay moves on to describe the heroes’ relationship to love. Chatsky and Molchalin, whose characteristics are presented here, represent this feeling in completely different ways and treat Sophia accordingly.
Chatsky is sincerely attached to the girl and loves her with all his heart. It is only for the sake of Sophia that he decides to return to Moscow. However, his feelings are rejected, which he cannot accept for a long time.
Molchalin deceives Sophia, pretending to achieve career advancement. Despite his youth, Molchalin belongs to the “past century.” For him, the customs and morals of old Moscow are elevated to an ideal, which is why he is accepted by society with such cordiality.
At the same time, Chatsky gives in too much to his own emotions and does not notice Sophia’s feelings. Molchalin remains cold and calculating. He is incapable of strong feelings.
Comparative characteristics of Chatsky and Molchalin (essay)
You can compare characters in a number of ways:
Molchalin |
||
Character | A sincere, passionate, straightforward young man. feelings often prevent him from soberly assessing the situation. | Helpful, cautious and very secretive. the main objective- career and high position in society. |
Social status | Moscow nobleman without a large fortune. He is received warmly because of his background and connections. | A tradesman from the provinces. Known in the world, but has no weight. |
Education | Very enlightened and smart. Received a good education. | Very limited person, whose judgments are primitive. Didn't receive a decent education. |
Field of activity | Has no position. There are mentions that he served in the army. | |
Social views | Freethinker and patriot. He is not afraid to be indignant at the orders prevailing in society. | Absolutely accepts and respects the existing system. |
Career views | I am convinced that only sycophants can achieve high rank. He believes that he has no prospects. | Ready to do anything for the sake of a career - endure humiliation, make connections. He takes his service very seriously. |
Features of speech | Eloquent and witty. Speaks Russian, but can also insert French sentences. | Official, very respectful speech. When communicating with senior ranks, he begins to flatter and fawn. |
Relationship to each other | Treats Molchalin with contempt. He believes that he has no merits. Tries to make fun of him at every opportunity. | He perceives Chatsky neutrally. Treated with respect. But he doesn’t see any benefit for himself in this person. |
Humiliated and insulted, he leaves Moscow. He is disappointed in love and rejected by society. | His fate is not determined, since Famusov does not know about Molchalin’s connection with his daughter. The hero can continue to serve. |
|
Role in a comedy | The main character around whom all the conflicts of the play develop. | Main antagonist. He is the embodiment of ossification. |
Results
Our essay is coming to an end. Chatsky and Molchalin are opposed to each other in the comedy “Woe from Wit”. The author does this in order to make the characters’ characters appear more clearly. Griboedov, using the example of these characters, characterizes the present and past centuries, and the reader must draw conclusions. The author’s position is clear - he takes Chatsky’s side.
Despite the fact that two centuries have passed since the masterpiece was written, the comedy has retained its relevance today.
